BinaryIdiot

1316 ms·

1. 2971.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   I disagree and agree. You're right in that better protocols can be swapped out in this design pattern and that's fine; most decent external service consuming code does this so it makes sense in that regard. But where I'm not
2. 2972.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   I disagree; you take the lessons learned about the old protocol and the industry itself and you build something new. If you have to include the old you'll always be tied to supporting some of the ways it works which may prevent innovat
3. 2973.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   I guess I'm a little confused here. As far as I can tell this isn't an email platform; it's a service that wraps IMAP and POP and exposes RESTful services. The grand claims in the text makes me think they're going to pro
4. 2974.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   This is a neat idea but this schema is a bit...specific in areas. Much like XML schemas of past the great thing about the JSON interchange format is that it's insanely flexible and anything goes (essentially). I feel like it would be a
5. 2975.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   Yes; I can't stand the approach of hiding meaning especially on a Desktop website. Horizontal navigation at the top for the win!
6. 2976.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   This. I can't imagine, except maybe in a development mode, where I would want all of these different modules loading at different times especially if they're loading later rather than referencing the script in the HTML's HEAD
7. 2977.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 12y ago

   I am. I was heavily using Sublime but switched over for a trial period to see if I liked it. Overall I'm quite happy with it; it's incredibly snappy for me (almost as snappy as Sublime) but it's start-up time is a bit slower.
8. 2978.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 13y ago

   It's not typically cost effective or realistic to build an entirely separate interface for administrative functionality (in fact, for user experience purposes, it's typically better to be able to administrator changes in place). A
9. 2979.▲
   by BinaryIdiot 13y ago

   After looking over the site it seems to be advocating simply serving static content statically and / or create single-page web applications. I'm not entirely sure 100% static makes sense either. For instance serving debug versus m
10. 2980.▲
    by BinaryIdiot 13y ago

    Just like Google's developer CDN, where they to put the versions in the URLs, it's best to give the control to the developer of the application and allow them to update versus an automatic update which could introduce incompatibil
11. 2981.▲
    by BinaryIdiot 13y ago

    Hmm I'm skeptical about the reliability of this especially on older browers. Does it track these events basically in an order? JavaScript is single threaded in the browser so multiple reschedulings could easily hit different objects an