Barbing

16 ms·

331.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Thank you for checking this!
332.
by Barbing 3mo ago
This post has been pushed from the first to the third page (rank 89, 221 points, +5hr).
333.
by Barbing 3mo ago
> auditably-private cloud computing Do those of you who have read the white paper have confidence in this claim (as I’d hope)? Blog: https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/
334.
by Barbing 3mo ago
I don’t think people like Linus Torvalds or Stephen Wolfram feel like language models beat them, just they’ve managed to find specific cases where flawed brainless workhorses serve their needs.
335.
by Barbing 3mo ago
>zero numbers You’re thinking of a different person. Most recent free article: https://wheresyoured.at/the-subprime-data-center-crisis/ Number after number, e.g.: “Per my own analysis, NVIDIA’s predicted $1 tril
336.
by Barbing 3mo ago
> each IP address still clones the same repositories 8-10 times per hour. Dumb! When was this fixed and don’t say never :)
337.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Just read this point in a case revolving around the Oxford comma, stated in simple enough legalese I could understand: “laws must be construed liberally in order to accomplish their remedial purpose" https://en.wikipedia.org
338.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Nullify if necessary, more likely duty to justice as best as I can come to understand it. We should all know it though!: It has been commonly used to oppose what jurors perceive as unjust laws, such as those that once penalized runaway
339.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Bender, even got yourself a great username. One of the most responsive authors in memory.
340.
by Barbing 3mo ago
30/s is preposterous. Are these loser companies who don’t want to cache on their end or are they getting unique info per request or could it really be that many different origins or…?
341.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Oh I came around myself. We got a blank screen and then the author was awesome and explained themselves and I'm satisfied having this one link as an extreme blocking test. Especially because they were thoughtful enough to archive the s
342.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Oh, I assumed Archive had an automated* tool in their arsenal to overcome the blocks that would’ve affected them. Didja happen to confirm they were blocked initially? *I think they do something manually sometimes, like logging into a The In
343.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Thanks. Regretful implementation*, being a normie on iOS Safari: https://i.ibb.co/vCDH79d0/IMG-0303.png …and not a bot… hoping not to turn off iCloud Private Relay to read, well, anything. (Maybe Google Scholar if I re
344.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Quote source is homepage, 3/4 the way down: https://hornet.org
345.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Interesting, anyone know if there’s a way to replicate this on Algolia? https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=fly.io …/from?site=$domain
346.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Hmm… Also post no longer visible on first dozen pages if I’m not mistaken.
347.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Perfect the enemy of the good there? The more support they get, the easier it becomes to justify dropping the price. The more likely a cheaper competitor shows up. Would this product have launched if a minimal profit cap were regulatorily m
348.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Man Bites Dog! Nothing pro-/anti-human or dog in that headline, just increasing intrigue without resorting to clickbait. Assuming a man really did bite a dog (bad!).
349.
by Barbing 3mo ago
For the company Flock, yes. For the community, the vandal, and progress, no.
350.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Other possible searches (in some areas): “heavy-set male with a black and white hat” “person on skateboard” “person wearing orange vest and construction hat” https://www.404media.co/how-cops-use-flock-to-track-p
351.
by Barbing 3mo ago
This post has just dropped from the top three to #72 on the third page (heavy downvotes/flagging?).
352.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Thanks jmull, this was my belief! Taylor Farms management has gotta learn the outcome of the Chicago Tylenol Murders like they should’ve learned in high school or college. Same for all TF competitors. Business ethics ain’t easy, they’re imp
353.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Thanks for acting out my daydream, Carl.
354.
by Barbing 3mo ago
orwin‘s response in a cousin comment helped me see your original valid point on harnessless LLMs! >You can achieve a lot by coding around the issues, but that's kinda against the point of 'AI', is it? Will think on that a
355.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Sounds very fair, thanks :)
356.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Maybe more fair then would be: “I've worked with these systems for four years now and while they _have_ meaningfully improved in that time frame, they’re not perfect and remain fundamentally flawed in various ways.” You prompt less. Yo
357.
by Barbing 3mo ago
If they use Python to fill the gap, and the end user doesn’t have to know or care, is it unfair to assess this as progress and attribute the progress to the _system_? OK, the core technology that is the language model still can’t math as we
358.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Is there a distinction we can independently assess between never retained and deleted or hidden? Asking especially given CEO’s track record https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47659135
359.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Like how toddlers’ skills don’t meaningfully improve on infants’, because either could wake up in a wet bed.
360.
by Barbing 3mo ago
Performative? (Sometimes meat feels.) Brandwatch and Sprinklr or whatever social media listening platforms have a blind spot or Taylor Farms doesn’t use them or what?

More ›