Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
B-Con
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
151.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
This is the correct answer. The interviewer is only the to gather data, the hiring committee makes the decision and they need concrete days to look at. "Take my word for it" doesn't fly as an interviewer.
152.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
I'll second this. Neither side really instances the other side and many buy into the headline narrative that the other half aee basically all extremist nutjobs.
153.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
"Official" is mostly about who they consider the customers of the product when making a decision. If the project is officially open-sourced, that will be taken into consideration when project priorities, re-orgs, and direction occ
154.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
This made me both chuckle and cringe a bit. Well put. The word you're looking for... My spouse suggested something related to trauma or PTSD. Then I saw "flashback" suggested.[0] https://english.stackexchange.com&#
155.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
I wonder what an active user is defined as for Twitter. Tweeted? Scrolled through their timeline? Read an embedded tweet on a news site? Dismissed a mobile notification? For a platform like Twitter (or Facebook for that matter) it seems rel
156.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
> If it makes economic sense for you to pay me $100k, making that conditional on where I live is just a jerk move. If you can buy a product for $50 from one site and that's worth it to you but you can buy it for $35 from another sit
157.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
> 1) just confirm that there are mechanisms by which he could have be not allowed to check in the code If that's what you read out of the post, when I literally said the opposite, I can't reason with you.
158.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
Considering that it's a DRM module, it's not a surprise. I believe anyone with a DRM module that does not protect it is at risk of losing their license with the content owners. That basically why DRM exists to begin with. Blaming
159.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
As I said above, the literal interpretation flat out wrong. There is no mechanism that exists now nor in the past to make the statement literally true as written. I don't know how they managed to get that statement, but it's mis
160.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
For a lot of the official content, yeah, that sounds right. But for the "unofficial" content? Absolutely, they were already arguably the largest music streaming sure to begin with, do they back fitted themselves into a proper stre
161.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
As a Googler, that statement is just wrong. They were looking for a fun story and somehow got just the right quote to make one. Code committed to the internal repo requires a review from someone certified familiar with that language
162.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
I think it's because C++ serves a wide set of users across a wide set of paradigms. I doubt every C++ dev is enthusiastically using every feature.
163.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
"pasta" is a meme replacement of "paste" is there copy/paste context. It's relatively popular, albeit uncommon on HN.
164.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
Pretty sure I first heard about them pulling these tactics over 10 years ago. Sad it's still ongoing. IIRC, after Godaddy blew up with their Superbowl commercial they've been ratcheting up the scam factor in every way possible. Ju
165.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
It is. This is how I would've written it.
166.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
CA won't implode soon. But momentum is hard to change and right now the industry is looking for a ways to not be in CA. It hasn't panned out yet, but once they are unlocked and can leave the region there will be a river of peopl
167.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
> The biggest loser, he predicted, would be California. California had been downtown hostile to the tech industry and grown complacent work the status quo because the tech workers had to be there. If tech workers don't have to be th
168.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
They decided they didn't benefit from certain job positions and did benefit by buying another company. What's the alternative action for them to take?
169.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
Allo and Duo were complimentary apps, their simultaneous release was necessary and had nothing to do with their adaption rate.
170.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
More broadly, it seems like a better cultural fit.
171.
▲
by
B-Con
6y ago
The best experience from IG's POV.
172.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
It wasn't suspended over the one, that was just the signal that they were doomed. The alternative was to wait a few weeks until a large fraction of the teams had incomplete rosters, owners and fans were furious at the asymmetrical comp
173.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
If you're qualified to work for a team that's hiring, transfers are pretty easy. I work for GOOG outside CA and know a lot of coworkers who transferred teams within the company from out of state. Lateral mobility is something of a
174.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
I've noticed the elevator disorientation too. I'm one with a built-in compass and the times that my expectations are diverted are rare and quickly corrected. Because of my natural outlook, it's odd to me to see people often s
175.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
Even if it does, that's way overnight on the article. A few 50KB here and there aren't your problem if you're blowing past a 250Gb or 1TB data cap.
176.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
Tools don't exist in a vacuum. When a tool is a closed platform driven by a business, that business is going to heavy-handidly steer how the tool is used.
177.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
> If email worked this way, the whole thing would collapse, because much of the time, you really do want to receive messages from new people. Of course. But Facebook isn't e-mail. A closed system that thrives on heavily weighted soc
178.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
There's a lot of context you had to make up to arrive at that interpretation for the first hand account you read.
179.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
In 99.9% of cases you don't. It's mostly spam. Facebook is a friend platform, not a stranger platform. Don't use it to message strangers, it's very explicitly not what the platform is designed for.
180.
▲
by
B-Con
7y ago
Not a good analogy because the people who hypothetically can best the market have incredible incentive to not share the details.
More ›