Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
AviationAtom
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
91.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
He didn't have a spare closet to put them in
92.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
They talk a little about the state of the project and it's ability to scale here: https://beehaw.org/post/438094
93.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
A copy of this particular post: https://beehaw.org/post/439761 Other interesting posts about Lemmy and scaling: https://beehaw.org/post/434849 https://beehaw.org/post/438094
94.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Beauty of the Fediverse? https://beehaw.org/post/439761
95.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
I really see it as an evolution of the problem with cell phone cameras. People will pay good money to sit at a concert, recording the concert on their phone (in crappy quality), rather than to actually live and experience the moment.
96.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
I agree with all the mentions of dystopia, and have often considered the "Metaverse" to very much embody such. Then I get to thinking and realize the Gen A'ers will soon enough exclaim "Okay, Millennial" when we sho
97.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
$3500
98.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Good making the distinction between the two. Google has been very explicit that they will not analyze emails of Google Workspace subscribes for ad targeting, but says little about how in-depth they analyze for Gmail users.
99.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
We already know the likely answer to this. They didn't make it terribly evident to Google Voice (Former Grand Central) users that their data was being utilized to train their transcription models for visual voicemail and the like. Goog
100.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Checkout Claude, from Anthropic. It's a team of ex-OpenAI folks. The results I've seen from it thus far have been most impressive.
101.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Google and OpenAI have more or less acknowledged that open source is going to dominate, in part due to the guardrails that corporations will be expected to put in place to "protect" their "vulnerable" population from the
102.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Hate to break it down further, but you're more or less asking for the equivalent of an IQ test to be able to use Google, IMHO. I don't blame you for seeking such, but there's a huge contingent of people that would call such a
103.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
I think it's a byproduct of a shift in RLHF to favor more "responsible" AI, as a result of huge community fears of the potential negative impacts of AI. Essentially "neutering" the AI's capability.
104.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Much like some people struggled with how to properly Google, some people will struggle with how to properly prompt AI. Anthropic has a good write up on how to properly write prompts and the importance of such: https://console.ant
105.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Have you tried Claude, from Anthropic? I've found it to be far more useful than GPT-4
106.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
It would be tough to also factor in the balance of that weight on the aircraft. Too much weight fore or aft of the wings can be deadly.
107.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Bad aircraft weight and balance absolutely can cause crashes and get people killed. It's less so the larger the aircraft gets, but still relevant.
108.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
They seemed to like it less when we blocked it, as their stuff completely failed to work.
109.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Compliance sucks, but it's required. I didn't make up the rules, just implemented and enforced them.
110.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Not sure you'll see this, with HN's lack of notifications, and so much time elapsed but here's the answer: Most consumer routers do not support disabling the web interface on the local network, as it's the primary (only?
111.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
This domain has zero to do with home use and everything to do with enterprise. DNS is one of the best tools for detecting and sinkhole'ing malicious domains using threat intelligence feeds. If the systems on your network are bypassing
112.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
If you're doing it right then you're using GPO and/or the policies file to lockout the ability to tamper with your preferred DNS settings on browsers in the enterprise.
113.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
I made it a point to NAT redirect all outbound requests to UDP 53 in our enterprise back to our enterprise DNS server. It would sometimes piss off our engineers, when they realized 8.8.8.8 was somehow resolving our internal DNS names, but i
114.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
It's been noted elsewhere in the comments, but I think it's worth pointing out that 1Password incorporates a similar algorithm for random password generation. It allows you to configure a series of uppercase words, lowercase words
115.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
I think you're misunderstanding the intent of this. It's meant to stop the theft of text authenticators, from breached databases. It shifts from "something you know" to "something you have." The problem with &q
116.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Correct. Nothing is centralized about Passkey (other than where you may choose to store your authenticators). Each site gets a unique keypair. If your keypair is compromised you can delete it on that given site. Passkeys is more or less jus
117.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
You hit it right. It's not much different than saving your HOTP/TOTP key into your password manager. Instead you'd save the WebAuthn private key and nobody could impersonate you without gaining access to your private key from
118.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Again, as I mentioned, the bulk of those rely on default creds. Many of the big manufacturers have been tackling that issue by forcing a password change at setup and not allowing an insecure default to be chosen.
119.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
If you don't expose any external services of the router then it's a bit hard for botnets to take advantage of your router. Most of these routers are likely becoming part of the botnet for enabling external web management and/
120.
▲
by
AviationAtom
3y ago
Merlin really is the best option for Asus, as Broadcom sucks about their drivers
More ›