Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Aurornis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Those unregulated sub-frontier labs become the new frontier labs because they continue advancing. They advance with the benefit of the open weight models that US companies were forced to release.
62.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> The law should apply to anyone selling model access to Americans So the US AI labs get taken out, and US companies fall behind on access, too? This is beyond unrealistic. > Our European and Asian allies would probably go along with
63.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> Open-weight models are "decelerationist" Open weight models are accelerating AI adoption and make it easier for other labs to advance their own models. There is nothing decelerationist about it. This entire line of thinking c
64.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Your whole argument seems to rest on the idea that the AI race is entirely contained within the United States, where we can regulate them. And that no other country might just take the open weights and continue right on with the advancement
65.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> It's a law, so nobody has to agree to anything. If want to sell access to a model, you have to open the weights. Laws don’t extend to the entire world. There are AI labs outside of the US that are not that far behind. Forcing US c
66.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> It follows if the goal is to deflate the bubble without popping it, The conversation was about AI safety, monitoring, and regulations, not bubbles. Forcing the weights to be opened to the world accomplishes the opposite of all of that.
67.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
This is incoherent. The argument seems to be that releasing the weights would slow the frontier labs from raising money, which would give them less money, which would slow progress on AI. It assumed all labs in the entire world agree to sel
68.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> You start from incorrect premises by presupposing agreed-upon rules would never work anyway. The rules would never work on a global economy. If you think the entire world is going to shake hands and agree not to let their companies use
69.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> Sure - look at what is being done today with H1B visas and tariffs. I have some bad news for you if you bought into the idea that the tariffs were good for domestic jobs and the economy. > What is more important to you - having a jo
70.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> How do you keep companies from using the replaced talent as a seat warmer? Hire 1 or 2 accountants, give them a chair and a cubicle, and let AI do the rest of the work. I don’t think the proponents of these ideas care about who does th
71.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> Namely, restricting the use of AI in corporate environments so that it does not destroy the economy as it advances. Regulate what, exactly? Limit what AI corporations can use? Other countries would love that more than anything. Basical
72.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> The problem with psychoactive drugs, as I understand it, is not the lack of positive results. There are plenty of well recognized cases. There is a long way to go toward solid research on this topic. The studies that exist have small s
73.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
David Sacks stepped down in March.
74.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Or they will use OpenAI, which allows guardians to complete age verification and enable work for kids age 13 to 17. Anthropic will likely open up, too. Right now both companies have more than enough demand and don't want to risk any jo
75.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> hen I benchmarked it on a (spinning rust) HDD Yes, but as your article notes HDDs have different performance characteristics depending on where the sectors are physically located on the platter. If you could force the swapfile to the s
76.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> Codex and Claude are both widely speculated to be sold at a loss (at least compared to API pricing) It's more likely that the API prices are highly profitable. I could see the subscription plans losing them money for some power us
77.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Selling a product below its cost of production can be done as a loss leader or market share tactic, but eventually you need to sell things for at least what it costs to make them. Economic dumping is a specific scenario where one country tr
78.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
I treat OpenRouter as a central point to access specific providers. Pinning is a given for that use case. I’ve tried using un-pinned models and the experience is exactly as you described: Some providers are so unreliable that the majority o
79.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> In Germany, this seems to be the case for a long time already. It’s the case everywhere. The date in the article is May. These links to the Claude help pages get submitted and upvoted on HN periodically. There is usually a big uproar w
80.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> If you'd told me 15 years ago that people would be running freely-distributed software originating from research labs in China on computers self-hosted in their own house as an alternative to authoritarian overreach and control by
81.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Two things that have helped me with quickly recognizing these situations: Programming for MCUs. Less so today when multi-hundred MHz MCUs are cheap, but even several years ago there were a lot of products where you needed to use the cheapes
82.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> 20 new bands a week is… I’ve met music lovers with hi-fi setups that maybe try 3 new albums a week! That’s really quite a lot. If you’re thinking albums and hi-fi setups, it would be a lot! A valuable part of streaming services is the
83.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> and I'd remind people that the relevant price isn't list price but what you actually pay. Fetching a Michael Jackson album out of a bargain bin for $1 is that album for a $1, If going to physical stores, sifting through barga
84.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Blind conviction without nuanced considered harmful.
85.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> I think people in the tech community have probably also noticed that it's rather popular to have an absolute opinion on the goodness or badness of these tools. For a while it seemed that having deeply held, nuance-free opinions ab
86.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Final round interviews are moving on site at many companies to prevent this type of cheating. Still important to understand how to code. If companies wanted someone who believed their job was to type prompts into Astra, they could hire inte
87.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Even referrals have to go through the interview process at every company I’ve ever worked for. A lot of referrals would not make it past interviews because they thought they were going to be handed the job without question and came unprepar
88.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
The free version of LeetCode is more than enough to prepare for standard interviews. Only mentioning this because I’ve seen some people stall their interview prep because they wanted to delay a LeetCode purchase until they felt they had eno
89.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
Several of these services launched around 2021 with introductory pricing, which is necessary for attracting new users to a new service. Most people I know don’t subscribe to every service and then leave it that way. They might have Spotify
90.
▲
by
Aurornis
1mo ago
> It is way cheaper long term. Buying CDs would be so much more expensive than my Spotify subscription with the variety of music I listen to. Another helpful element of the streaming services is no incremental cost to try out a new movie
More ›