Aurornis

30 ms·

541.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
These laws are not covering things that increase sales by 50% If that was true, sales would fall to 67% of the pre-law sales. That doesn’t happen. It’s a silly claim. It would be like the government taking 6% of your total compensation for
542.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> it's literally the cost of buying goods in a variety of places. Not an accurate analogy. This is a fine on sales, not expenditures. It would be like fining you 6% of your pre-tax income, not doubling sales tax on things you buy. &
543.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
I was also referring to published papers available to the public. Like I said, I think you're bringing some assumptions to this conversation that aren't based on the how the industry came about.
544.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> Perhaps I'm imagining it but the entire industry was build on public research There is some excellent publicly-funded research in there, but pivotal papers like Attention Is All You Need and the numerous pivotal OpenAI publication
545.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
The article is vague about the companies in the paper, for some reason. In the paper, OpenAI is at the top of the chart for cumulative citations. MEGVII, Hugging Face, Waymo, Momenta, Preferred Netowkrs, Anthropic, Owkin, and Databricks, an
546.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> This is a bit of a strawman. The parent comment wasn't suggesting that the inherent defects magically disappear The parent comment literally said that the common LLM defects would go away. Direct quote: > all of the common LLM
547.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> In-context, your reply reads like you're asserting that anthropic's offerings give you all the same control as a local model, and that having this baseline of control over a computer program is "utopian". No, I’m ta
548.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
If you want to share information about balcony solar, submit a neutral link explaining it. Don’t submit an admit for a product that comes with a subscription.
549.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
I don’t understand why this specific product is being upvoted. It’s not a good deal, it’s a very low power system, and it tries to get you to pay a subscription fee. This is an ad for a poor deal and I think some are upvoting before they cl
550.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
This is rare. Some times they'll have people drive in from a couple hours away and put them up in a hotel for some nights. If you're unlucky, the job will be far away but below the cutoff for a hotel, so you have to choose between
551.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> On the website and even here, there is no advertisement of an endorsement or use of the author's name for this product. In fact, it is an attribution. I'm talking about the submission title, which makes the claim that Manim (
552.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
I have an M5 128GB. Being on the cusp of practical is a good description. It will run, but prefill and token gen are still slow relative to my consumer GPU box. It also gets very hot. If you’ve never heard the fans on Apple Silicon really s
553.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
No.
554.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
I’m talking about price for a given output. You’re talking about companies using more tokens. Completely different concepts. As I said, the price for a given quality of LLM output continues to decline. Has nothing to do with companies using
555.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> Well the answer is that VC-backed companies Look, I enjoy local LLMs as much as anyone, but I think there is some motivated reasoning happening in this thread to try to make local LLMs sound like a utopia against those evil VCs. Local
556.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> Want it to go away, almost like magic? Local inference. When its under your control, and no longer being forced to hold it wrong, all of the common LLM defects will go away. This is just not true. Any local LLM you can host on consumer
557.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> which people are getting charged more and more for. Completely false. The price for LLM inference at a given level of model intelligence has been dropping like a rock. There are more expensive models available, but you don't have
558.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
Yes they do. They're drawing so much attention for the funding precisely because the business model is so attractive and has such a large TAM.
559.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
MIT license does not give someone license to advertise a completely different project with your project's name and the name of its famous author.
560.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
First, this has nothing to do with the topic. ACM provides digital access. They don't have a single copy of a physical book which they're going to send to another company for destruction. Like I said, they're not deleting the
561.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> Before you decide to change jobs Trades work is hard. Traveling to a far away job site every day and doing physical labor in a building that isn’t heated or cooled yet is the complete opposite of our comfortable office or remote tech j
562.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> We never intended to use 3Blue1Brown's name in a negative or misleading way You submitted this with the title “Manim (3Blue1Brown's animation engine) in the browser via WebGPU” Being misleading is exactly what you intended to
563.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> So describing this as vibe coding Manim in Rust and then closing the source is inaccurate. Your team submitted this with the title “Manim (3Blue1Brown's animation engine) in the browser via WebGPU” If anyone is being misleading, i
564.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
Worse: It's a paid tool. They're trying to ride on top of 3Blue1Brown's code and fame for personal gain.
565.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
Looks interesting, but to be honest I'm put off by the idea that you had AI rewrite someone's library and now you're using their name and brand to promote your $20-$100 per month tool based on their work. Calling it Manim in
566.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
I also wish we had an infinite supply of expert teachers available to work 1 on 1 with students at any time day or night for a nominal fee. Sadly we do not, so something like this will have to serve as a more accessible backup.
567.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> most people around the world, access to the typical leading models is out of reach. Not many on this planet can pay the subscriptions (or even API keys) that offer access to the best models. So I'm not buying the argument that tec
568.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> averages strike again. My comment said "median" explicitly The number was for household wealth. I think you're looking at individual wealth, which would naturally be lower because it's spread across more people. Sou
569.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
The median US household has a net worth of $200,000. Even a 50th percentile US household is very wealthy by global standards. Credit card statistics are heavily manipulated because it's easy to make them sound terrible. I don't kn
570.
by Aurornis 3mo ago
> average klarna effective interest rate:25-33% APR [2] > getting what are effectively individual lines of credit per-burrito or iphone is crazy work and I wouldn't recommend it most of the time. I think this whole sub-thread ha

More ›