Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Aurornis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
22 ms
·
451.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
Depending on your location this will happen for any item with a certain value and presumably risk score. It's not a unique decision they made for RAM. Probably happened to your order because the value was high enough and your location,
452.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> with very, very expensive logic analyzers... But yeah, nothing weird here. You can’t simply get an expensive logic analyzer and probe PCIe or memory buses at these speeds. There are expensive custom fixtures that need to be made to eve
453.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> You absolutely can reverse chips with logic analysis. You are not going to reverse engineer a GPU with a logic analyzer and by applying currents to pins. You could replace oscilloscope with logic analyzer in the comment above and nothi
454.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> but many openings sit for MONTHS which just does not line up with the anecdotal evidence of people going 6-12 months without an interview much less an offer Neither of these things are evidence of “ghost jobs”. When I was doing a lot o
455.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> He did that by connecting oscyloscops to all chip's outputs and started with applying random current on inputs This is absolutely not how reverse engineering a digital logic ASIC works. Either the story got embellished through ret
456.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
Every piece of software comes with giant disclaimers like this. You’ve just been clicking past them. This really isn’t new.
457.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
I suggest everyone look at the game to put this in context, because it's most likely not what you think it is. https://llmgame.scalex.dev/ This is how it opens: > 1 MINUTE UNTIL YOUR NEXT MEETING > Claude Code i
458.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> I think that solving a problem they have that has a side effect of generating more revenue is not lost on them. I think you’re overestimating the revenue generated by this. Having a separate LLM with a cached input prompt check command
459.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
If you’re implying that the LLM companies are trying to train their models to make malicious tool calls so they can collect a few more tokens on the review, then I don’t know what to say. I guess threads like this are just a breeding ground
460.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
If a company advertised an LLM as perfectly safe and then it caused some damage, there would be a case against the company. Have you used LLM tooling? It comes with warnings and explains that the user accepts the risk. Different levels of w
461.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> Shut the stupid AI craze down before it finishes destroying whatever's left of our planet. I think a lot of the protestors are using data center protests as a proxy for some other belief like this. They think slowing down a data c
462.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
This data center site was so far away they had to organize bus transport to the area. Nobody was going to hear it unless they drove to it for the purposes of hearing it.
463.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
A separate model with separate context is used for review. Like I said above, some people will never be happy with LLMs being allowed to do anything and nothing is going to make them happy about it. It’s only fair to discuss what the real c
464.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
Harnesses like Codex support having a separate agent perform reviews on commands to try to identify malicious or broken commands. Some people turn it off because they either don’t understand or don’t want to spend the tokens on it. The comm
465.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> You can advocate for changes to a system while living and existing within the system. I see very little advocating for change and a whole lot of knee-jerk reactions to shut it down. The data center protests near me tried to complain ab
466.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
Nikita Bier's whole claim to fame was getting apps into top positions in the app store. It's his thing.
467.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
I haven't been following it closely, but Nikita posted recently that they were running experiments to de-monetize the top accounts found to be reposting spam content. I don't know where it went, but he did say that in the A/B
468.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean-room_design There is a lot of legal history of doing new designs with influence from reverse engineered sources. The basic rule is that you can't have someone familiar with the
469.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
The debate is about whether or not the new code qualifies as derived . They can remove all of the literal code matches from the codebase, but if it was written by having an LLM study the original code and then write something similar, it&#
470.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> Buying a gardening robot (if such a thing existed) would completely defeat the point. Unless your hobby is backyard robotic gardening. Which is my way of saying that people have different reasons for enjoying a hobby. Like most hobby d
471.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> LLMs expedite achieving the end result. Take from that what you will. It's an age-old debate in every hobby. Some people are in it for the process. Others are in it for the end result, which is what they want to use or play with.
472.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> In these communities (keep in mind that there is an implicit “not all…” throughout) the process of mastering a difficult field itself is the product, and something that runs is generally a nice-to-have. Most hobby fandoms have a dedica
473.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> Watching the optimism and then collapse of Web 2.0 What collapse of web 2.0? Technically the website we're on is web 2.0 because we're interacting as users. I don't think it's naiveté on their part to want to build
474.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> This is such a flawed, but common take. Are you seriously going to claim you were never a junior dev that nobody trusted with "hard tickets"? No I was talking about the older devs who got comfortable not progressing, just tak
475.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> I don’t know who needs to hear this but raising a ton of money is not success. You don't raise this much money this fast without having some success to show the investors. Oxide raising this much money is a big accomplishment.
476.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
There’s more to labor than hours worked. Sitting at a computer for 8 hours is a different load than landscaping for 8 hours in the middle of summer. Number of hours worked has actually been trending down for a very long time.
477.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
She stepped down several years ago. She was still listed as an advisor in some capacity, but she moved on to a different startup.
478.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
The claim of the article is that expectations increase at a faster rate than the work becomes easier. It probably feels that way to someone who got comfortable doing their job the old way wishes the world could go back to when they had it a
479.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
> Labour saving devices do not save any labour for the employees, their workday is just as long. Anyone who has ever worked a physical labor job will be rolling their eyes at this. There are more dimensions to labor than the number of ho
480.
▲
by
Aurornis
3mo ago
I consider Clean Code to be in the category of books/styles that is helpful for early developers who need some structure, but harmful to late-stage developers who adopt it as dogma. On a long enough career path, eventually you will run
More ›