ArthurStacks

8 ms·

31.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
LLMs cannot replace what we do. Only AGI could do that, at which point you could say the same about anything. 'Racist' in your culture, not in mine.
32.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
None-of-your-business LLC
33.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Most of our engineers are hired because of their experience. They don't really tell us how to do things. We already know how to do it. We just want people who can do it. LLMs will hopefully remove this bottleneck.
34.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
We don't produce software for clients. We provide solutions. That is what they pay us for. Until there is AGI (which could be 4 years away or 400) there is no LLM which can do that.
35.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
It's our company, we own it. We are not 'some executives'. If someone develops an AI that can replace what we do and perform at the same level or higher, then I would gladly welcome it.
36.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
That might be the case if we were an organisation that resisted change and were not actively pursuing reducing our staff count via AI, but it isnt. In the AI era our company will thrive because we are no longer constrained by needing to fin
37.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Not at all. We dont care whether the software is written by a machine or by a human. If the machine does it cheaper, to a better, more consistent standard, then its win for us.
38.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Wrong. Because we dont just write software. We make solutions. In 4 years we will still be making solutions for companies. The difference will be that the software we design for that solution will likely be created by AI tools, and we get t
39.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
We have a very successful company that has been running 30 years, with developers across 6 countries. We just make sure we hire developers who know that theyre here to do a job, on our terms, for which they will get paid, and its our way o
40.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Weve done this since 1995 and it works perfectly well.
41.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
I have no idea why you think you can't test a distributed system. Hopefully you are not in the business of software development. You certainly wouldnt be working at my company. Secondly, people are not just blindly having AI write code
42.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Well, youre right to be skeptical because the majority of "AI" going on is hype designed for the purposes of either a scam, getting easy investment funds or inflating company valuations. But.. the capabilities (and rate of progres
43.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
[flagged]
44.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Its his and his managers product, so yes. We don't care if they code it, don't code it, whether an AI builds it or a cheap Indian. Theyre still responsible.
45.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Why? We fully checked the design, what he built, and it was fully tested over weeks for security and stability. Don't parrot what you read online that these systems are unable do this stuff. It's from the clueless or devs coping.
46.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Beating humans isnt really what matters. Its enabling developers to design who cant. Last month I had a staff member design and build a distributed system that would be far beyond their capabilities without AI assistance. As a business owne
47.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
I run a software development company with dozens of staff across multiple countries. Gemini has us to the point where we can actually stop hiring for certain roles and staff have been informed they must make use of these tools or they are s
48.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
It got you the 20th century
49.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
These people are about to become extinct.
50.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Written by someone utterly clueless
51.
by ArthurStacks 1y ago
Nobody is going to be writing code in 2035
52.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
You should have spent more time in school
53.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
Another headline to correct: "whiney desperate scientists fearing their grift is up, try to claim that AI research isnt that good"
54.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
I run a software development business. I know as good as anyone where things are headed
55.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
The only people saying this kind of thing are coders desperate to stay relevant. There is no future in coding. Its gone in a few years. Instead begin learning the skills required to work with AI to get it create what you want.
56.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
I would not hire him in my business regardless of how 'good' he thinks he is. I'm interested in people who can get work done.
57.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
In my company I would have told him to start doing some work and getting stories delivered or he's gone. Yes, he's being useful in assisting others but I can easily find someone who can do that and their own work at the same time.
58.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
Yes and look at what a shithole your country is because of doing the opposite.
59.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
No it isn't going to change, because it's part of our culture and we don't easily let foreign riff-raff in to corrupt that. If youre pinning your hopes of the future of your country on the peasants taking from the rich, youre
60.
by ArthurStacks 2y ago
If I lived in the USA I would be concerned, but I live in Switzerland and have residency in two other wealth haven countries, with businesses across multiple European countries. It isn't something that is an issue for me given the atti

More ›