Arodex

10 ms·

241.
by Arodex 4mo ago
Well, if he did it and there was no opposition, it certainly makes it "valid". Where exactly has it been made invalid? Has anyone done anything to make it invalid? Aren't they free, and can they do it again? And the slush fun
242.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>if you joined a protest group where the organizer shoots a policeman and you’ve all got weapons at home and then you tell people to move the material you have at home that indicates you’re part of the group then I think the convictions
243.
by Arodex 4mo ago
If you want a discussion, here it is: >this kind of behavior can't be normalized What happened to the Jan 6 rioters? Ashli Babbitt received military funeral honors for what? Discuss: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition
244.
by Arodex 4mo ago
That's a perfectly good way to waste kW of energy every day and make the heat outside worse.
245.
by Arodex 4mo ago
Yeah, the attention of armed people with the authority to order him around. See how ridiculous that sounds?
246.
by Arodex 4mo ago
It is well know there weren't deep structural problems at the time of (and caused by) the gold standard... I don't understand why people keep banging about the theoretical advantaged of a gold standard whan it was the default mone
247.
by Arodex 4mo ago
I see you didn't go down the page to "trends by age". It is not ad hominem to point out you don't search and you don't understand.
248.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>the base rate for cervical cancer deaths under 30 was already near zero. It has never been zero between 1970 and 2019. It has been completely 0 between 2020 and 2024.
249.
by Arodex 4mo ago
As mentioned already several times in the comments, there is also a long tail of people who survive but after a grueling and costly treatment that disrupt their lives.
250.
by Arodex 4mo ago
[flagged]
251.
by Arodex 4mo ago
The "grammar of graphics" conceptualized in ggplot is a very cohesive way to make (I think almost) any kind of graph, while remaining a high-level language/DSL.
252.
by Arodex 4mo ago
With batteries, not only is renewable more reliable, it is also much easier to maintain grid stability.
253.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>Please try to be specific. https://www.rechargenews.com/analysis/smrs-v-renewables-mini... "What about the costs, both in terms of Capex to build them and the levelised cost of the power they produce? Gadomski
254.
by Arodex 4mo ago
[flagged]
255.
by Arodex 4mo ago
All the R&D and industrial capacity building we have done since the 70s could have been accelerated if we had invested in it as much as we invested in nuclear, or oil, or gas, or coal. With public money. https://www.americanp
256.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>We wouldn’t have increased Solar panel efficiency if we followed such ill advice. We didn't for decades. The photoelectric effect is known since the XIXth century. Solar panel research could have had far more money behind it since
257.
by Arodex 4mo ago
What is the cost of storing fissile radioactive material? This is making less and less economic sense. All paid by public money.
258.
by Arodex 4mo ago
https://phys.org/visualstories/2024-05-mass-fish-die-vietnam...
259.
by Arodex 4mo ago
No, it isn't a made-up number. We know pretty well when do fishes die en masse , as we have seen it in periods of extreme heat before. The research has been done and is how the limits have been defined.
260.
by Arodex 4mo ago
If you don't know that nuclear plants are routinely shut down in the heat of summer because the cooling water is too hot, you should learn more before opining on the topic. See this comment for more info: https://news.ycombi
261.
by Arodex 4mo ago
"En Suisse, on s'entend bien parce qu'on ne se comprend pas".
262.
by Arodex 4mo ago
This isn't a silly argument, this is a problem of allocation of resources. We could have had mass solar deployment since the 70s. We chose not to, and allocate the money elsewhere. Nuclear will take away billions in public money, put i
263.
by Arodex 4mo ago
So, when cost is of no importance.
264.
by Arodex 4mo ago
Money doesn't grow on trees.
265.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>the entire US Navy uses them Is the business of the US Navy to sell electrity on the market? You are the one conflating things that have absolutely no connections.
266.
by Arodex 4mo ago
Your small nuclear reactor is going to need almost as much engineering , plumbing, safety mechanism, personnel, maintenance, etc... as your big nuclear reactor.
267.
by Arodex 4mo ago
If you need 500 MW, you build one 500 MW reactor, not five 100 MW reactors. They will take more space. As for speed, a 100 MW reactor is not commissioned in 1/5 of the time a 500 MW reactor is.
268.
by Arodex 4mo ago
Slight hyperbole, but nuclear reactors in Switzerland and France shut down more and more often because the water needed to cool them down is already too hot: https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/climate-adaptation/beznau-n
269.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>i feel like available space, time to complete construction All of these favor again bigger reactors. >considering the length of time and sheer number of people, companies, and governments considering/investing in SMR tech it s
270.
by Arodex 4mo ago
>The problem with solar is that you need power 24/7 and solar will not make power in the night. Ok, question: for the cost of one nuclear power plant, how many batteries can you have? For the cost of the R&D of one next generati

More ›