Arnavion

48 ms·

631.
by Arnavion 3y ago
My experience is the exact opposite.
632.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Yes, and I don't want a backward-incompatible Rust 2.0 either, but the slowness of stabilizing ! (named for when it's going to be stabilized), specialization, TAIT, const-eval, Vec::drain_filter, *Map::raw_entry, ... is annoying.
633.
by Arnavion 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36993546 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36996704
634.
by Arnavion 3y ago
The whole conceit of this conversation is that iforgotpassword has (a thought experiment of) a router where they've managed to "turn off the firewall" but still expect safety due to the use of NAT. My comment was about how th
635.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>My understanding is that Zig has all of the power and modernity of Rust, without the strictness and borrow checker. This is an oxymoron :) The strictness and borrow checker are part of the power and modernity of Rust. But even apart fro
636.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Same. I don't care about Proton compatibility for games and only look for native support. Something that works on Proton today might stop working tomorrow if the developer only cares about Windows. Even for games that do work on it, th
637.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Not the same people, no.
638.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Your ISP could be incompetent or malicious and not filter bogons out. Or you could be sharing a subnet with another tenant that has a misconfiguration on their end or is just plain malicious.
639.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Whoever controls the router you use to connect your LAN to your ISP.
640.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>Even better not single of my devices living behind only nat in 20+ years was taken over or ransomed. Yeah, because you didn't turn off the firewall. And/or because your ISP was being nice / competent and not routing packe
641.
by Arnavion 3y ago
NAT will map an incoming packet with destination WAN_IP:port to LAN_IP:port. It is irrelevant for incoming packets with destination LAN_IP:port.
642.
by Arnavion 3y ago
My argument is about LAN devices ending up with publicly reachable IPs. It's not contingent on the ISP allowing more than one IP address per customer connection. BTW, since you think you can turn your router's firewall off and rel
643.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>With NAT it is impossible to disable the firewall. Nonsense. If we suppose a switch to turn the firewall off, we can suppose a switch to turn NAT off and convert the router into a bridge that connects LAN and WAN. Then a LAN device can
644.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Don't know about your situation, but the only time I'm reminded Cloudflare exists is also when they throw me into a captcha loop that I can't get out of. In fact since yesterday gitlab.com has been blocking me with a Cloudfla
645.
by Arnavion 3y ago
If you use their nameservers, yes. If you just use them as a registrar and have your own nameservers, then Cloudflare is not involved.
646.
by Arnavion 3y ago
It pops up a dialog box that you've successfully dejigamaflipped your domain.
647.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Same for me. At the time I got my .dev's I'm pretty sure only Google Domains sold them. I moved to porkbun now as well.
648.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Well if the name's annoying you, the dejigamaflip button will make you toss the book in the bin for sure.
649.
by Arnavion 3y ago
All this talk about what is or isn't stable ABI on Linux is irrelevant to the article anyway. The article's author explicitly doesn't want their 15-year LTS to ever update its OS or libraries. So ABI stability is not a concer
650.
by Arnavion 3y ago
They're implying they wanted to pay for 15 years support but found no takers. Is the problem that nobody wanted to support them for 15 years (their insinuation) or that they didn't pay enough? Given they keep talking about 5-year
651.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>Statically linking libc is heavily discouraged ( https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57476533/why-is-statical... ) Your link is about glibc, not libc in general. For example musl is perfectly fine to link static
652.
by Arnavion 3y ago
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brave
653.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Technically the units of temperature are "degrees Celsius", "degrees Fahrenheit", "Kelvin", etc. ie "degrees" is part of the name of the units "degrees Celsius" and "degrees Fahrenheit&
654.
by Arnavion 3y ago
The submitter also fixed the incorrect use of the degree symbol before K, lol.
655.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>Each team (pm/test/dev) were responsible for building the threat model themselves, but the threat model was reviewed by another security team. That still happens. >Is annual security training still a thing? Yes it is.
656.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>Cloudflare sends the closest city from where the request was made which ought to be sufficient to optimize for a cdn I guess? Appears that archive.is doesn't have a locus standii in this debate... https://news.ycombinato
657.
by Arnavion 3y ago
>Does Verisign need to know that 2001:2345:6789::abcd is looking for news.ycombinator.com? Verizon wouldn't know that even with ECS, because ECS only needs to include the subnet prefix of the length that the client (Cloudflare'
658.
by Arnavion 3y ago
That's irrelevant to the overall point regarding word-splitting. dotnet represents filenames as String, so there can be nothing in the pipeline that couldn't handle them. Files whose names can't be represented in String are a
659.
by Arnavion 3y ago
Yes, double-checked locking is broken if the code does not use fences to enforce the order of checking the initialized flag and getting the value. TFA uses atomic operations to do that.
660.
by Arnavion 3y ago
You can use std::once_flag and std::call_once from <mutex> instead of rolling your own atomic solution.

More ›