ArinaS

9 ms·

61.
by ArinaS 2y ago
SimpleX? https://simplex.chat/
62.
Censors Ignore Unencrypted HTTP/2 Traffic (2024)(upb-syssec.github.io)
62 points by ArinaS 2y ago|14 comments
63.
by ArinaS 2y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20250414150812/https://www.polit...
64.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> " It's surprising and stupid. " I think it probably is irrational, but I don't think there's any way to combat such biases. It's just how humans as social species are - we're less likely to trust some
65.
by ArinaS 2y ago
And obligatory https://nitter.net/MarcACaputo/status/1911517973766127978 .
66.
Using bad hardware: why I work in the terminal (2024)(colean.cc)
56 points by ArinaS 2y ago|57 comments
67.
by ArinaS 2y ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/aws/comments/1jupura/just_got_compr... - this post you're referring to?
68.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Well, this looks legit, as this is a real domain registered in 2022, but I still don't get why would you make a new post on a freshly registered domain after a 3-year pause and immediately submit it to HN.
69.
by ArinaS 2y ago
And what was the previous domain name?
70.
by ArinaS 2y ago
The posthuman.blog domain name was registered yesterday on April 12, right when this post was written - https://www.whois.com/whois/posthuman.blog . And this is the second of only two posts there, with the first suppose
71.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Btw the posthuman.blog domain was registered yesterday, right when this post was written - https://www.whois.com/whois/posthuman.blog .
72.
by ArinaS 2y ago
You can contact them via email which is on the main page of the site. If it's not fake obviously.
73.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Oh true. It's there in archived version but now absent in the post itself. Maybe they're reading HN too?
74.
by ArinaS 2y ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/Millennials/comments/1jx4unb/anyone... - original Reddit post they're talking about + https://ghostarchive.org/archive/XwHey?wr=false - archived versio
75.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Is there any particular date/time you'll introduce a no-JS solution? And are you going to support older browsers? I tested Anubis with https://www.browserling.com with its (I think) standard configuration at https:&#x
76.
by ArinaS 2y ago
I'd strongly recommend to find a working SearXNG instance but if you don't want to deal with it, Bing's index (for whatever reason particularly the one used to power Yahoo) is currently pretty good at searching niche websites
77.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> I think a large portion of HN commenters are unaware of the consumer demand for these features. For me it's just that "ordinary" users don't complain about them being added, which in practice means silent agreemen
78.
by ArinaS 2y ago
According to downdetector yes, it is - https://downdetector.com/status/whatsapp/ .
79.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Everything looks good on paper but build it first.
80.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> " assuming one even exists " I actually doubt it does. Everyting is just too chaotic to be a strategy.
81.
by ArinaS 2y ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/Millennials/comments/1jx4unb/anyone... - original post + https://ghostarchive.org/archive/XwHey?wr=false - archived version of it.
82.
by ArinaS 2y ago
The Dead Internet truly doesn't look like a conspiracy theory now.
83.
by ArinaS 2y ago
I don't see that point in the original comment. Remembering copyrighted content ≠ reproducing a verbatim of it.
84.
by ArinaS 2y ago
Personally I've never understood why would someone use a website to download videos when you have yt-dlp. A standalone program is more reliable and more ubiquitous than a website. And despite "yt" in the name, it's not o
85.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> Why is that? Because a developer isn't a marketer?
86.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> but few know how to market, sell, or validate an idea. I think you answered your own question.
87.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> this article confuses an absence of "heated arguments" with a lack of constructive, critical discussions. Doesn't the article refute exactly this point of view? In " The hidden cost of “nice” teams " section:
88.
by ArinaS 2y ago
> I don't understand what that means. Probably "code that nobody critiques will fail in production". That's not always true I guess.