Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Ardit20
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Because we have not heard of a $225K microscope before - thus the microscope must be well good - but have heard of $10M research building and actually expect the latter.
32.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Good luck with that. Barriers to professions - which includes access to research - is what keeps the professionals well paid and thus perhaps allow them to fund more research. Isn't that infringement of copyrights by the way? Do you think i
33.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
I have not heard of any experiments being carried out in monkeys with bleach which showed positive results. I do not see what your point is. Is this not something new, hence news, but something well know to the mysterious field of drug rese
34.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
that should probably be network advertising
35.
▲
Ask HN: Does anyone actually make any money from Affiliate Advertising?
18 points
by
Ardit20
16y ago
|
16 comments
36.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Or late night orgies. What is so bad about that? Sex is pleasure. Everyone should be able to have the pleasure if so they please.
37.
▲
The Google Apps Marketplace
(google.com)
2 points
by
Ardit20
16y ago
|
0 comments
38.
▲
Why NoFollow Tags Suck
(searchenginejournal.com)
2 points
by
Ardit20
16y ago
|
0 comments
39.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
I did not use the word desire, hence I do not see why you would? I think searching is more of a necessity, at times perhaps more than friends. My friends might for example not be able to tell me about 1200 BC, something which a history stud
40.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
It is indeed amazing, but the answer can be simpler. Without pain, there is no such thing as not pain. You need to feel what pain is, so that you know what it feels like to not have pain. If we all were in some sort of utopia, or heaven, we
41.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
The media might make them seem like they do not pass the common sense check, but judges are people of many years of real life experience and the system of precedents manages to make the law fairly clear. Also, if a claim is trivial, or purs
42.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
"I also have a rule that anybody that does not want to be reasonable has to sue me" That might work with the average Joe or the guy in his basement, but a public figure might, knowing that he vastly out powers you in terms of law expertise,
43.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
I agree. I would also suggest that Google search plays a much more fundamental role to the internet than Facebook. Facebook in my opinion is a trend, like yahoo chat was or usernet. Its a way for people to communicate and people move their
44.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Nope. I am 1 in 7,000,000,000
45.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Times Roman is so very hard to read on the internet :(
46.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
How do you know that the birthrate of startups is expanding? I was expecting to see numbers and graphs.
47.
▲
Thanks for submitting my post...
(weblog.raganwald.com)
3 points
by
Ardit20
16y ago
|
0 comments
48.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
what's the new school thinking?
49.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
"Additionally the posts on HN are more likely to be negative" What exactly do you mean? That people do not comment on here, ohh this is brilliant, we love you, you're our god, even if the guy said something obvious or something which isn't
50.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
or lack of consent
51.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
I did not say the US government. I said: "we have read only recently by certain people asked to be arrested in defiance of international law" Why would I want a screenshot? This was written at 8:30 US time http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08
52.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Conspiracy has a bad canotation. You can have a conspiracy to overthrow some government, you can also have a wacky belief into something which has no base in any reasonable doubt to believe. The latter being the way the word conspiracy theo
53.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Wow. This is simply amazing.
54.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
He had that sentiment already which is encouraging.
55.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
I am confused now. You just said: "That's the thing you see. This man does not know better!" - because "If he knew better he would have been running a startup and laughing his way to the bank." - That is make money. rather than "This man is
56.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
His files are closed for 70 years! So it is not a good example, hence the added details about being the dawn of the war in Iraq and although he was on the news, not quite known in the way the wikileaks founder is. This government appears to
57.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
Your post might have been sympathetic, but you basically argued that because he has the will to leak information without the consent of those who want to keep it secret, there is a high probability that he would have sex with a woman withou
58.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
He does not know better because he values a principle above money?
59.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
You can't just shoot him. This is not communism, nor nazism, nor fasicm, this is democracy, where the rule of law is supreme. If he is shot, there would be no people arguing about pointing fingers, everyone would know who dun it, there woul
60.
▲
by
Ardit20
16y ago
That is quite clever. You can't just arrest him. You can't just kill him either because then we all would know who dun it, but rape is well, anyone can be accused of rape, it would be your word against the "victim". It would be quite a circ
More ›