ArchReaper

39 ms·

91.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
>The one year we turned a profit, we celebrated with a pizza party that pushed us back into the red. Literally the 3rd line of the article.
92.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Why should anyone care? I don't see anything technically novel or interesting in this. Edit: I'm not disparaging this, I'm asking a question...
93.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Does not work in IE, Firefox, or Chrome. Fuck you, too, Apple.
94.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
What service do you use? 5/mo is really cheap for 10+sites/apps
95.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Non-paywall link?
96.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Our legal system is a giant pile of shit, and anyone who thinks otherwise is either woefully misinformed or trying to line their own interests.
97.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Any company that expects more than 40 hours a week should be automatically disqualified from picking 'work life balance' imo.
98.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Maybe my viewpoint is too 'elitist' or something, but I have a hard time taking this seriously when one of the chief complaints of Typescript is that it is too "difficult" It really makes me question the validity of the
99.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
>What's the point of saying 'Wikileaks is trying to distract us from happenings in Russia' when you are not even specifying the things we are supposedly being distracted from? Am I required to have omniscient knowledge of
100.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Discussion from last: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14920664
101.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
I wonder what political news story this is trying to take attention away from...
102.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Ya, I fail to see the benefit of this (for IoT) over using any other widely-available technology for secure communication (SSH, etc)
103.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Why are they allowed to request this with no reason? Why can the government dictate what I'm doing with no legal basis?
104.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
OK, let me be more specific. How is the request legally sound?
105.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Thank you for responding, these are some really good points that really made me rethink my opinion of this topic. I definitely agree that I do not want extremist groups to grow and become even more of a 'thing' in the US. However,
106.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
How is that legally sound?
107.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
You're right, I was quick to judge and patronize the previous comment, which isn't helpful. My b. I think what irked me, specifically, is the way the question was phrased, as though guilt was the default assumption, which is absur
108.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
I hope this is an opportunity for you to learn and not just me wasting my time addressing a troll. >what alternative is there to find out who they are? That's not the question you should be asking. The question you should be asking
109.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
This is absolutely insane. I hope this eventually reaches an appeals court that understands the 4th amendment.
110.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Wow, what an incredibly narrow world view. Are you under the impression that everyone in the world has had access to decent education their entire lives? Are you under the impression that motivation is the sole factor in determining one&#x2
111.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Maybe it was flagged because the broader technical community doesn't give two shits about some perceived internet slight and is not interested in childish politics infesting software projects.
112.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
This was a waste of time to read.
113.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
That's a really dishonest argument. How are they supporting the people? How does this benefit society? All this does is attempt to take away the spotlight from other shit happening in our country. Every major country develops hacking s
114.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
It's really sad that this is what Wikileaks has turned into. Regardless of the authenticity of the information, they clearly only release information when it is politically beneficial for their(?) motives.
115.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
And pencil marks can't be erased?
116.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
I don't see any supporting arguments that directly support that thesis. That's a very open-ended, subjective statement.
117.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
I'm no Facebook fanboy but this article feels like a "why does my square peg not fit into their round hole" type of complaint. Facebook is a social network, not a public blogging platform. Here is my interpretation of the com
118.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Generic fearmongering isn't adding anything to the discussion.
119.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Morality is an inherently grey subject. Boolean morality only exists in a vacuum. I do agree with your underlying sentiment that it's all about perspective, but I don't feel like you're adding anything to the conversation, as
120.
by ArchReaper 9y ago
Your whole post is disingenuous and full of logical fallacies.[1] >Take a homeless person and let them sleep in your kitchen in exchange for mowing your lawn -> moral hero. This is a flawed thesis if you're still trying to argue

More ›