Arch-TK

47 ms·

631.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
But ... the email provider can't force you to give them a picture of you. I mean... unless they force you to give them _a picture_ and then do verification to check that it's you. Which is never going to happen.
632.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
I don't understand how this opt-in email tied service which you or your email provider has to implement is in any way preventing you from having disconnected identities online. If you own a domain and your disconnected identities are a
633.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
Was going to comment this. Definitely should just be done with webfinger instead of creating a new .well-known.
634.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
If someone is on your network, you have to start worrying about traffic spoofing, unless you've got a seriously locked down switch (I do). But even so. Poor security practice to use a wildcard. I completely agree there. But I can under
635.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
Wildcard certificates are sub-optimal. I have a personal policy of not using them. They become very much like a "shared secret" which you have to properly manage. I know LANs don't need world class security, but as someone wh
636.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
ZTA is fun to experiment with in your home LAN. And to be fair, most people's networks could benefit from it. That being said, the recommendation in this post is not for proper ZTA.
637.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
People don't want their internal infrastructure to end up in CT logs.
638.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
trap "rm $IMG*" EXIT see https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC2064 also, use mktemp -d and recursively delete the directory
639.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
# shellcheck disable=SC2064 trap "cleanup '$SCR_IMG'" EXIT While shellcheck can have false positives, and SCR_IMG probably doesn't have any characters which need escaping, it's not exactly wrong i
640.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
>Line 2 and 3 for example make it impossible to override certain behavior you’ve set. This is intentional. It's not possible (unfortunately) to allow users to simultaneously be able to override a variable OR add to a variable in mak
641.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
Unnecessarily vague and uncharitable comment but I'll bite. While I recommend anyone who uses GNU make should read the manual, the manual is full of outdated best practices which can be safely ignored. If I was going to use this makefi
642.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
The recommended Makefile has several issues, not least of which being that it relies on dependency fulfilment order which can be non-deterministic (e.g. if you pass -j). The project structure includes flavour-of-the-week litter like .devcon
643.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
It's possible to take a somewhat unopinionated approach to CVSS, the issue is that such CVSS scores exist in a vacuum, and vulnerabilities exist in environments. It's not possible to really apply a CVSS score to a vulnerability in
644.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
CVSS 3.1 score is 4.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L). (You can somewhat argue UI:N but I don't think it applies in this case.) Lots of corps would spend a non-trivial amount of effort to remedi
645.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
If everything you wish to achieve in response to a signal can be achieved within the signal handler, you do not need a condition. Just `while (1) pause();`. Granted, this isn't a very common situation, but I can imagine a few use-cases
646.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
pause() is fine, as long as you don't do it conditionally.
647.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
I just played around with the fan curves. The Noctua fans are pretty damn silent below a certain speed (especially with GPU fan noise usually being louder). So I tried to keep them running faster than necessary at lower speeds and only ramp
648.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
My usual experience flying between the UK and Europe and in three cases China was that 2 hours has always been sufficient before departure and that 1 hour is about the limit after landing.
649.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
With a Noctua NH-D15 and about 30 minutes spent tweaking the motherboard fan curves I was able to get my 5950x to not thermal throttle without producing any noticeable fan noise. This seems extremely over-engineered and sounds like it could
650.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
I use them so much that I begin to struggle with languages which don't have something equivalent.
651.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
So I've been in numerous situations where having JavaScript enabled was either undesirable or impossible, granted, it's my own fault for using strange platforms like a Nokia N900 or whatever, with strange web browsers. But it&#x27
652.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
Given that this uses `target`, doesn't it mean that unlike htmx you can't easily make this gracefully degrade when JS isn't enabled? And, yes, I know, saying "when JS isn't enabled" in 2024 is a bit like saying
653.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
I hate it when Tim Sweeney of all assholes is right. Honestly this just makes Epic look less awful and is clearly just good PR no matter how you look at it. But equally speaking, Tim's company heavily relies on locked down operating sy
654.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
So my habit of putting in a lot of effort to prepare 1 or 2 cups of coffee per day puts me at the local minima for risk of dementia and stroke? Excellent. Now, while gloating about how this study matches up with my own biases, I would like
655.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
I just use i.slow.network as my internal domain. Most things support search domains to avoid having to type too much.
656.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
>struggle using git on the command line and use git status nearly every other command I think you are conflating two separate things. I don't care for starship or prompts which show git status information. But, when interacting with
657.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
For anyone wondering "Why would you boot from an untrusted/compromised server?" or "Isn't this moot? If the server is compromised, it can just send a malicious binary." the short answer is: The binary that the
658.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
Given how long it took MSVC to attempt to support anything above the bare minimum C support for C++ interoperability. I wouldn't hold my breath.
659.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
That's not a C23 feature. It's a non-portable compiler extension which has existed for a _long_ time.
660.
by Arch-TK 3y ago
"slightly better" - nah, just as mediocre. Let me tell you, nobody stuck with C is going to bat an eyelid at this standard. They're going to continue using C89, or maybe C99 if they're lucky, for whatever reasons that ju

More ›