Aperocky

15 ms·

301.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Not just about business, but almost everything professional.
302.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
AI is amoral is an opinion. Following the market is also not cravenly amoral, AI or not.
303.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
The demand is massively increasing, but filled by less people and more GPUs.
304.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
If AGI can be controlled by corporation or governments, that's not very intelligent of it is it? You have a clear idea of what AGI would look like, and don't want that. I think you don't and none of us do, it will surprise us
305.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
I meant as a society we should want AGI, but I understand that's not how most feel.
306.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
> And let’s be clear: We don't need AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). In general, I think we want to have it, just like nuclear fusion, interplanetary and interstellar colonization, curing cancer, etc. etc. We don't "
307.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Almost nobody seem to see college as a place where people can develop the skills to learn itself ? Did it get that bad? It doesn't matter that I didn't remember how to do real analysis, but I had that class, and I learned it at s
308.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
> took this seriously That assumes Iceland consider "National Security Risk" as politically charged as it is in other major countries.
309.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
It can both be Business Process Optimization and an AI strategy. In fact, if an AI strategy becomes business process optimization, I'd say that AI strategy for that company is successful. There are too many AI strategy today that isn&#
310.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
> This thing needs to never go down worldwide Quantity introduce a quality all of its own in terms of maintenance.
311.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Not useful, because the signal are too weak to be picked up probe to probe. On earth, the tiny signal from Voyager at this distance is picked up by dish the size of a football field; same with sending of the signal.
312.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
That is statistically not possible, unless you are dealing with very small sample size. The "until no one does" is not something that can happen in something like npm ecosystem, or even among the specific user of "left-pad&
313.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Most of the time people sit on complex because they don't have a strong enough incentive to move from something that appears/happen to work, with AI, cost would be a huge incentive.
314.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
It has everything to do with node/js. Because the community believes in tiny dependencies that must be updated as often as possible and the tooling reflects that belief.
315.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
To not use npm. Or create a package manager like npm. Or believe in philosophy that we should have as many small dependencies as possible. If you must use npm, containerize/VM it? treat it as if you're observing malware.
316.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Shai-Hulud is the best thing to happen for npm. It's much easier to demonstrate a problem (twice!) than to convince a herd that there is a problem. I hope that other languages with similar package manager (looking at you, cargo) take n
317.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Well that's an easy fix, just brew them on weekends too. Life is not just work and also deserve to be caffeinated.
318.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
But you never had to quit - studies don't indicate that moderate caffeine consumption had negative health effect, even had unproven heart benefits (as a runner, it certainly doesn't make me slower). And I don't think this is
319.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
AI can generate specs and development plans but a tremendous amount of trash can slip through those specs and plans resulting in complete garbage as output. I'm using AI a lot, in planning but I take close manual oversight on specs and
320.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
They can once they achieve purpose. However that seems completely tangential to the current AI tech trajectory and probably going to arise entirely separately.
321.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
There's one front page new that allude to events happening in December 7th and 8th despite dating to November 22nd. I assume you select the stories automatically, but the time of the story might not be correct.
322.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
It does push people and not gently. But it does open up engineering to do much more on otherwise under engineered areas and open up entire new fields.
323.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
There's a lot of things that are theoretically possible, but to realistically consider them based on the known likelihood is something I'm not entertaining here.
324.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
You can solve every one of the logic puzzles and it should not give you any score that high, unless it's a specifically designed bogus test to make certain person look and feel good. It's like saying your regular thermometer retur
325.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Exactly.
326.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
It's not impossible, but improbable.
327.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
That one person in our entire history somehow got tested accurately (is that even possible? there isn't any sense or point for any IQ test to even go into that range, because what would you be baselining and verifying the test against?
328.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
There is no assumption, that is the definition of IQ. Is human intelligence a normal distribution? Probably not. But IQ is extrapolated as such, and probably useless anyway. Which make absurd claims like this even more laughable.
329.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
There are no such thing as 210 IQ. It correlates to 7.3 sigma, meanwhile 7-sigma event has a probability of approximately 1 in 390 billion. We only have 8 billion humans on Earth. These absurd claims about IQ is almost evidence that the cla
330.
by Aperocky 11mo ago
Fundamentally I think the job of engineer is to translate a business or real life scenario into logic. This is true for any kind of engineer, and is not restricted to software. I held and continue to hold that software engineer shouldn&#x27

More ›