Antibabelic

13 ms·

271.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Clojure being so low, including below Prolog of all things, is so obviously wrong.
272.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Could you elaborate on what you mean? I'm not quite sure what kind of hidden truth you're referring to.
273.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Doesn't seem to cover any logic programming, that's a shame.
274.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Ah, 4chan, the final bastion of truth
275.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
The 30% you're outsourcing are where the growth happens. If you don't have any idea how to improve beyond a vague feeling that AI outputs look "better", I recommend checking out the book "What Is Good Writing?"
276.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Are you implying the light discussed in the paper is supernatural?
277.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
> Note: Written from my own experience, with Claude helping me structure my rambling thoughts into something readable > #Personal Growth Why not spend a bit of effort to rewrite the draft yourself? That's how you learn, and well,
278.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
Overuse of rule of three, cliches like "This was not X. It was Y." and similar, obligatory bulleted list, overall overly grandiose. None of these are a smoking gun, but the smell is definitely here. AI detection tools also confirm
279.
Death by AI: Will large language models diminish Wikipedia?(asistdl.onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
1 points by Antibabelic 1y ago|1 comments
280.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
The goal of Wikipedia has always been to summarize what mainstream secondary sources say, not what is "true" or "right" according to your or some other editor's personal opinion. See WP:DUE, WP:VNT and WP:RGW
281.
by Antibabelic 1y ago
I've always felt like stating percentages only provide an illusion of rigor. They're still based on vague intuition. I also think there's nothing wrong with sometimes thinking in absolutes. In some cases it's okay to thi
282.
Good Bye NixOS, Hello Debian (Again)(karl-voit.at)
4 points by Antibabelic 1y ago|0 comments