AntiDyatlov

6 ms·

31.
by AntiDyatlov 2y ago
Might change it then. My original vision was just Vajra and Gnosis, but then I started feeling like maybe they're both too loud so I added the Simple style. But yeah, Vajra is the one I personally use.
32.
What do you wish that everybody knew?(thequestion.diy)
3 points by AntiDyatlov 2y ago|2 comments
33.
by AntiDyatlov 4y ago
If AI really is poised to automate away large segments of the economy, the correct answer is to bring on UBI, financed by heavy taxes on AI companies. If there's no work to do, it's time to chill!
34.
The Trolley Problem Is All Too Real(squarecircle.substack.com)
2 points by AntiDyatlov 4y ago|0 comments
35.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
Can you ask DALL-E to draw itself?
36.
The Worst Story Ever(squarecircle.substack.com)
1 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
37.
I would pay for good web search
3 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|1 comments
38.
To Die Before You Die(squarecircle.substack.com)
2 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
39.
Alexander the Great Was Aristotle's Greatest Achievement(squarecircle.substack.com)
7 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
40.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
> Neuroscience doesn't have a stance on the philosophical questions of consciousness Yes they do, I saw Stanford prof Andrew Huberman say we're just a flow of electricity. Read of another neuroscientist that claimed there is no
41.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
Well, that is a real question. But that is not my argument. I point out instead: 1. The big arguments used to disprove God also disprove your own existence, as they disprove the existence of sentience. 2. There are religions centered on sen
42.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
> Except I can scream really loud, god can't > I effect things, the invisible dragon doesn't effect things, just going "both of these are invisible" misses the point of that, IMO According to neuroscience, you don&
43.
God Is as Real as You(squarecircle.substack.com)
3 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|7 comments
44.
How to Defend Society Against Science [pdf](anarcosurrealisti.noblogs.org)
1 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
45.
AI Defense in Depth: A Layman's Guide(aidid.substack.com)
1 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
46.
Could you have stopped Chernobyl?(aidid.substack.com)
3 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
47.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
Surely they don't believe the odds of GOF research producing a much more lethal pandemic than the one we're dealing with are 0%. At the same time, nobody ever showed that GOF research has benefits commensurate with the risks. It w
48.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
Maybe, maybe not. If the main incentives behind GOF research are wanting to churn out papers, seems like the field would just vanish.
49.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
The world resembles Beirut in 2019 more than one would think.
50.
Science as currently practiced is an existential risk(facebook.com)
1 points by AntiDyatlov 5y ago|0 comments
51.
by AntiDyatlov 5y ago
Science as currently practiced is an existential risk: https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10159653334879228