AngryData

10 ms·

91.
by AngryData 26d ago
No, but the majority of people would be fine with killing other types of mass murderers.
92.
by AngryData 26d ago
In many places you can have both, if you spend a tiny bit more money adapting the road way around nature or accepting occassional inconviences.
93.
by AngryData 27d ago
One person commiting a war crime is not an excuse for someone else to commit a war crime.
94.
by AngryData 27d ago
The people making the final decisions on their usage have the money to avoid 99% of it themselves and figure they will be dead before it would really matter to them. The rest are either ignorant or put their livelihood at risk oppossing a m
95.
by AngryData 27d ago
Because our civilization relies on governance and corrupt and degraded government can fail and collapse countries and even civilizations, leading to immeasurable levels of harm to all of humanity. It is a form of mass scale murder once you
96.
by AngryData 27d ago
They naturally evolve because we put them in an enviroment where they thrive. Changing voting systems to proportional representation instead of winner-takes-all would be a huge start.
97.
by AngryData 27d ago
"Kidnappings", such as someone being a few hours late on exchanging custody of the kids with zero danger to them.
98.
by AngryData 27d ago
The poorest communities are the punching bags for police. It is the wealthy communities that don't care because they have money for lawyers to make charges disappear and connections to make cops play nice in their communities, poor peo
99.
by AngryData 27d ago
If the US did something so economically hostile it would tank its own stock market just from the world cutting off a bunch of trade.
100.
by AngryData 27d ago
I mean that is the biggest factor now, but also because most of the rest of our federal politicians are also worthless and corrupt.
101.
by AngryData 27d ago
In my state saying kids can't go anywhere near a body of water unsupervised is saying kids can't ever be outside without full time supervision.
102.
by AngryData 27d ago
Also I would note that every person beyond the nosy neighbor had a profit motive to pursue charges.
103.
by AngryData 27d ago
I agree but also is it really that difficult to use some sort of auto-caption program with maybe an asterick not assuring accuracy? I feel like it would be impossible to legislate the quality of captioning and it isn't like mistakes do
104.
by AngryData 28d ago
You act like it is impossible to use land that beavers live on without destroying the beaver dams or removing the beavers, and yet there are plenty of people that do that very thing their entire lives without a problem. I didn't say th
105.
by AngryData 29d ago
I mean provided there was a distinct surface to see then it could happen if it was strong enough, but the problem with the bucket is it's limited depth. If the bucket was 20 foot tall I doubt you would see the bottom before those struc
106.
by AngryData 29d ago
How many other tasks is it not suited for now though? If we wanted a device to automate limited specific tasks then we don't need advanced highly advanced robotics. A human has strength, dexterity, high balance, very sensitive tactile
107.
by AngryData 29d ago
If you don't want to deal with swampy land full of beavers, don't buy swampy land full of beavers. They should of done a better job purchasing land.
108.
by AngryData 29d ago
It was more of a storage problem than a production problem. Plenty of grains and foods people grew throughout known history were more than capable of providing all the calories someone would want or need without crazy effort. The problem is
109.
by AngryData 29d ago
This is why im not worried about "AI" taking over the world. Robotics still has a LONG way to go. A human can balance a plate on their arm with food while holding a glass of milk in that hand and a donut in the other and still man
110.
by AngryData 29d ago
Labor being cheap is more of a locale dependent condition in China now, their well developed cities and industries have had rising wages for 2+ decades now and the labor discount is small enough to be more like a side-benefit to already man
111.
by AngryData 29d ago
I don't read AI slop as a general rule so I don't see it is a personal problem. It just isn't trustworthy enough and it is just full of extra verbose language that lacks the nuance I expect from a human writer. Maybe LLM repl
112.
by AngryData 29d ago
If they gave a crap about the will of the people then why is marijuana still illegal? When you defy the will of the people 99% of the time, claiming your motivation is the will of the people when it is convenient rings pretty hollow.
113.
by AngryData 1mo ago
I haven't played since the GUI release, but in the past you definitely had to set a fortress population limit to prevent FPS death. Also, assuming DFhack still exists, you can try using it to clean up the messes and splatter which can
114.
by AngryData 1mo ago
Why? Dwarf Fortress only exists because it was given away for free for decades, bringing in tens of thousands of dollars in donations, and eventually leading to a fandom popular enough to bring others onboard with the project to produce a G
115.
by AngryData 1mo ago
I wouldn't consider that a universal feature. It can certainly help, especially if you are aiming for a generalized audience, but not every game needs to be either intended for or accessible to every person. I would use Crusader Kings
116.
by AngryData 1mo ago
I mean being a known fraudster, requesting money from Epstein, and asking about some girl he met through Epstein is context too which is not a good look. He may be innocent, but he certainly has a large stain and stink about him.
117.
by AngryData 1mo ago
Is it really that bad? I haven't played since the GUI update but was thinking about getting into it again because I still have years of muscle memory from it. But if I am forced to use the mouse im not sure I even want to bother. There
118.
by AngryData 1mo ago
Wasn't the graphical interface 95% outsourced to others? And originally the graphic version was suppose to be layered on top and leave the underlying version of the game barely touched from the player's side. It was even touted as
119.
by AngryData 1mo ago
Well I guess its neat they added a tactile map for the blind at the beginning of the maze, except the solid hard barrier at the bottom within the very narrow spaces and with hard corners is a massive tripping hazard even for people who can
120.
by AngryData 1mo ago
We should also note that it is a gimmick meant to sell expensive specialty bulbs. Addicts don't need good light to find a vein. And even if it was a problem they still have a lighter and/or phone.

More ›