AlyssaRowan

68 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   Bug filed, btw, response received, it's probably going to be replaced with a better implementation.
2. 542.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   Makes a hell of a lot more sense than rebasing 70-odd separate patches for your internal use! Making LibReSSL-portable is a good goal, and this work can be used to improve both (and OpenSSL, too - some of this found its way into the OpenSSL
3. 543.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   Precisely that. It's rather a pain in the ass for antivirus products, which tend to have a nesting limit to prevent these kind of shenanigans. There are much weirder things you can do. With knowledge of what's packing it and if th
4. 544.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   No relation with the devs. Just a decade-old conversation about PGPdisk, IVs and trouble export laws might cause, so it's perfectly OK to not put _too_ much stock in it.
5. 545.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   Just an old, slightly jaded reverser who hung around the right places, and you don't really _need_ to care: it doesn't tell me what happened, just that a 'something bad happened' whistle was blown. It could just be as si
6. 546.▲
   by AlyssaRowan 12y ago

   Bugger all, it's just a random site I happen to host.