Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Alupis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
45 ms
·
661.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
It depends, as things usually do. $20 here, $10 there, eventually ends up as $600 monthly or more, and no customer anywhere in sight. That may, or may not be sustainable or make sense. Flush with cash? Knock yourself out. Bootstrapping? You
662.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
My experience has been Claude is better at all coding/technology questions and exploratory learning. It's also night/day better at less common tech/languages than others (try asking ChatGPT questions about Svelte, for ex
663.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Most software businesses start off as "toy apps" and are paid for out of pocket. The parent's comment is right - that is a lot of money for not a lot of value, particularly when you are early stage. The trick is in finding ba
664.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Probably better said as "BEAM is a secret weapon". BEAM languages (including Elixir and Gleam) share the benefits Erlang enjoys by also being part of the ecosystem.
665.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Cuba can trade with most of the world...
666.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
What equipment is needed for Cuban's to harvest fish? People have been harvesting fish from the ocean for thousands of years. They have been making bread for even longer. Sanctions are not why Cuban's aren't able to eat. Cuba
667.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This article is about bread. Bread, perhaps the most simple, easily manufactured food on the planet. It doesn't even take fancy modern equipment to make - people have been making bread for thousands of years all across the world. Cuba
668.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> however, is legally evading them In tax law, this is considered avoidance, ie. you are avoiding overpayment. If you so much as use any tax preparation software, you are actively avoiding overpayment of your taxes.
669.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> Is that fair to say given that it's been found illegal? Those activities were not illegal at the time. If the laws have changed, then as a tax paying entity, these people/businesses will have to comply with the new laws and&#
670.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
So are you telling us when you prepared your recent tax return, you spent zero time ensuring you paid only the required amount? Avoiding paying taxes you are not legally required to pay is not tax evasion.
671.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Yes they are. Look at these fuel economy numbers (broken down by number of butts in seats)[1]. 60-100+ mpg equivalent per seat. What car or truck is getting 80+mpg while hauling a 40,000lbs payload, for example? Not to mention how wildly ef
672.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Unless the UK is going to totally isolate themselves from the entire world - people and goods will still travel in and out. Only by vastly less efficient means. The UK is not isolated, and will never be. In this implausible scenario, people
673.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
It would not. Those people would still travel - just by far less efficient means.
674.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
So if the UK banned all airplanes - what changes for the world? Oh, that's right. Still nothing. You are hyper-focused on a meaningless gesture that you were told to believe by people who continue to fly private jets around the world
675.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
It's really unfortunate people cannot fathom how insignificant your butt in an airplane seat, that will take off with or without you, really is. This climate change thing really has become people's new religion. Deny anything that
676.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
I think you missed the part where even if 100% of academics committed to not flying, still not one thing changes . The "do something, anything!" crowd needs reality checks from time to time. Consider yourself checked...
677.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> TLDR: Researchers in one big university survey in UK tend to prefer taking air travel (mostly juniors) than taking train or other alternative methods Perhaps they realized one fewer booking doesn't prevent the flight from happenin
678.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> “Speed was the most important thing,” said Jeff Gardner, a senior user experience designer at CrowdStrike who said he was laid off in January 2023 after two years at the company. “Quality control was not really part of our process or o
679.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Interesting data. This[1] seems to suggest that this relatively small solar sail would be able to reach the moon from earth's orbit after ~3 years (I could be horribly misinterpreting this data!). That seems impressive, given how "
680.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> Let him tweak it insignificantly. Yes, because everyone is happy with the current system, so let's do something to make sure it lasts forever! Politics and naming aside - the current system is awful and expensive, and did nothing
681.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Is there any indication of how much thrust/acceleration they expect from this, and over what time scale?
682.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
No? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Micro_Devices,_Inc._v... .
683.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This sounds like something rms would do, but also seems like a great way to turn people off to your text editor. If you haven't learned Emacs before, are you really going to put up with broken-by-design behavior?
684.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Some fine folks over on the Unix & Linux StackExchange seem to have offered an explanation to this question[1]. [1] https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/137842/what-is-the-...
685.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
It seems its probably more of a shell thing, than a linux thing. I've never run into this as an issue before, but I would wager it's the "Save" muscle memory which unexpectedly causes this issue for some people.
686.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Rewriting history does not change history.
687.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
AMD almost went bankrupt because of Intel's illegal behavior. Intel received a small slap on the wrist, shrugged it off, and then proceeded to do nothing with their illegally-won cleared playing field (making what is perhaps the single
688.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Intel is a tarnished brand, sullied by unfixable bugs, suicidal chips, security holes, poorly executed "next gen" ideas, and worse. The only thing they're capable of these days, seemingly, is re-releasing slightly optimized,
689.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This is a really odd take to have. By the "past year's worth of development" I assume you mean the layoffs? Have you been in the industry (or any industry) long? If so, you would have seen many layoffs and bulk-hiring frenzie
690.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
I'll ask again. What is stopping these countries today ? Handwavy, vague "post-colonial" whatever isn't a reason, it's an excuse.
More ›