AlgebraFox

7 ms·

31.
by AlgebraFox 1y ago
What problem do you think Play Integrity solve other than keeping the user's under Google's walled garden? Play Integrity is a fake marketing term for DRM fromGoogle . It does not guarantee security of the device in any way. My 6~
32.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
But you would trust Mozilla who repeatedly betrayed it's users yet still lying Firefox is a private browser?
33.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
This is a bad idea. I don't know if customization made by LibreWolf to protect your privacy would be undone by using Mozilla's version of the profiles.
34.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Google is afraid of small performance penalty. GrapheneOS offers knobs to control compatibility. You can always turn off individual protections, in case an app could not function under default settings.
35.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
GrapheneOS team has done an amazing job building a rock solid OS for mobile. But because it does not have the feature you need, doesn't mean it's useless for rest of us. I use it everyday for it's privacy and security feature
36.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
If anything, it just confirms Mozilla is selling data.
37.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
I think it's safe now to call Mozila's management as criminals. They are using old Mozilla's reputation to profit off people's data.
38.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
LibreWolf can do it.
39.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Sync is end-to-end encrypted. Even if they want to introduce ToS, it should be only for Sync feature, not the whole software. Also why Sync suddenly requires ToS after two decades?
40.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Why is Mozilla copying my search? It should only goto the search engine I selected. Mozilla doesn't need that data. Firefox just does the HTTP transfer and display's on my screen. Almost all software does that. Also why Mozilla di
41.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
That is your interpretation. It may not be Mozilla's or a Judge's interpretation.
42.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
How is it reasonable? Firefox is a MPL licensed software. Why would they suddenly need a ToS if it is just a software? The speculation is that they are going to expand their data collection for ads and covering their ass via this new ToS.
43.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Please read ToS once again. "You Are Responsible for the Consequences of Your Use of Firefox Your use of Firefox must follow Mozilla’s Acceptable Use Policy, and you agree that you will not use Firefox to infringe anyone’s rights or vi
44.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
It is very clearly mentioned in ToS that it applies to Firefox as well. "You Are Responsible for the Consequences of Your Use of Firefox Your use of Firefox must follow Mozilla’s Acceptable Use Policy, and you agree that you will not u
45.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Please check the link in ToS. It leads to this Acceptable Use Policy https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/acceptable-use/ "Upload, download, transmit, display, or grant access to content that i
46.
Why is no one talking about Mozilla's latest madness?
46 points by AlgebraFox 2y ago|23 comments
47.
Introduction to JIT Vulnerabilities in JavaScript Engines(trustfoundry.net)
2 points by AlgebraFox 2y ago|0 comments
48.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Signal has implemented too. https://signal.org/blog/pqxdh/ "Post quantum" or "quantum resistance" are common terms used to describe crypto that is harder to crack by quantum computers. I don&#x
49.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Exactly. I have no idea why people trust Apple when they were working with NSA and China for surveillance and censorship. Their software is 100% closed source. You've no idea what it does despite all marketing. They may make great hard
50.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
That works for nerds like us. But my sister or my non tech friends don't have knowledge to self host. It is like asking a person to do a surgery on themselves when they don't have medical knowledge. E2E services are very crucial f
51.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Nextcloud works great on GrapheneOS if you are willing to self host.
52.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Apple is a hypocrite. They already were a huge partner to NSA's PRISM and China's surveillance programs. Their privacy marketing is solely because they could not tolerate profits made by Google and Meta. Now they also want to beco
53.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Just upgraded. All customization were automatically applied with no issues so far. Amazing work OpenWrt team.
54.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
I really hate those who ask for GitHub profiles. Mine is psuedo anonymous and I don't want to share it with my employer or anyone I don't want to. Besides privacy, I do not understand why a company would even expect the candidate
55.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
True. But even paid apps have access to these data and can collect it without our knowledge. A genius called Stallman proposed solution decades ago. Free software aka. open source software. But outside of tech community, open source is not
56.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
No matter how many blog posts try to justify Go, it is a lost ship. Yes it is used by many companies (I still don't understand why), but that does not make it a well designed language. > But secondly designing errors as explicit val
57.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
Android apps can anytime do remote code execution. GrapheneOS even offers controls to restrict Dynamic Code Loading per app. But Google somehow cares only about RCE in browser extensions?
58.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
This is why more competition like System76 is important in Linux space. GNOME is pretty much a corporate controlled GUI. It sucks so much if you want to do anything advanced or productive (I use GNOME by the way). That is why I am excited f
59.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
https://github.com/simplex-chat/simplex-chat/blob/stable/fla... Their flake.nix indicates they use Haskell to generate cross compiled shared library for Android, iOS, Mac, Linux and Windows. I am not exp
60.
by AlgebraFox 2y ago
https://simplex.chat/ Private messenger for desktop and mobile platforms. It's mostly written in Haskell except for UI.

More ›