Ace17

54 ms·

511.
by Ace17 11y ago
Interestingly, I think it might have. Would you rather hire a "clean code" lone developer, or a "messy" one?
512.
by Ace17 11y ago
Tox-im is peer to peer, and calls work rather well (voice + video).
513.
Prototyping procedural maze generation algorithms using fibers(code.alaiwan.org)
2 points by Ace17 11y ago|0 comments
514.
by Ace17 11y ago
Just ordered one!
515.
by Ace17 11y ago
Exactly. D is "C++ done right".
516.
by Ace17 11y ago
Too much dynamicity? Ward Cunningham: "What killed Smalltalk was it was just too easy to make a mess" (source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YX3iRjKj7C0 )
517.
by Ace17 11y ago
"The farther ones travels, the less one may know."
518.
by Ace17 11y ago
"you can use abstractions but keep them transparent" Wouldn't it defeat the purpose of abstraction?
519.
by Ace17 11y ago
OK, let me rephrase it. The better your software architecture is, the more resistant to technology changes it will be. (it doesn't only apply to technology changes, by the way). I understand your examples. When a technology changes occ
520.
by Ace17 11y ago
By your definition, my inability to fly like birds qualifies as a lack of freedom. I think you may be confusing your freedoms with your concrete possibilities (i.e what you can do). Also, you need to distinguish the freedom of your users (X
521.
by Ace17 11y ago
Software architecture precisely is about abstracting your application code away from technology. Practising TDD is a good way to allow you learn about how to better design your components. Because all your components end up having two clien
522.
by Ace17 11y ago
You just made my day :-)
523.
by Ace17 12y ago
95% of the code I work on is D. D fits lots of purposes (more than C++), but I'm only going to talk about scripting. The minimalistic approach for the C++ standard library makes C++ inappropriate to replace, for example, Bash scripts
524.
by Ace17 12y ago
Have you seen D? ( http://dlang.org/ )