Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Aachen
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
361.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
If someone uses git commits like the save function of their editor and doesn't write messages intended for reading by anyone else, it makes sense to want to hide them For other cases, you lose the information about why things are this
362.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
So far I haven't had much concrete reason for my family to switch away from Windows. The updates maybe, needing to pay for a new license and the UI changes are like pulling the chair out from under them, especially as they get older (W
363.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
> Is it really inconceivable to you that the thing could have bugs? Or user error, or hardware setups where the docs didn't say "don't do that". If zfs is somehow better in any of those three areas, that would result
364.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Posted 9 minutes before your comment... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662987
365.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Note that phones also have NFC readers. Instead of requiring everyone to have a locked-down phone, they could offer day you use said phone to read the chip or use any other (USB) reader you like. I believe there's a German government a
366.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Are you saying there's a threshold percentage somewhere below which you're happy to A: exclude these people from society or force them to switch to big tech, and B: accept the consequence where a single other country holds access
367.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
There's a difference between needing to lock down the whole OS and just the secure element. The secure hardware component can sign a challenge and prove possession of a private key without you being able to extract it. Smartcards have
368.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
The nfc chips in identity documents
369.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Also if you are legally required to be able to use some backup mechanism, it can become the de facto requirement
370.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Thanks for confirming I remembered the razor names correctly! I still don't assume malice, at least as a default / until strongly indicated otherwise, from any individual employee. Emergent behavior of complex artificial incentive
371.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
I'd call them video/image generators because I don't know the word for the underlying technology. I can't imagine they're LLMs because, indeed, the second L is for language
372.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
> when they tested good chess players on random board positions they were just as good as people that did not play chess. Doesn't that prove the opposite as the statement in the first paragraph if they were only as good as non-playe
373.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
I'm not sure most people are that naïve that they can't differentiate between "any computer that acts smartly" (how the term "AI" is used) and the word chatbot. Of course, LLM is even more precise
374.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
This. It's so far out there that I have to wonder if it's a rogue employee who thought this a good excuse to cause reputational damage without it being too obvious. Doesn't pass several razors though (not the simplest explana
375.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Tip: tomatoes are on offer at Contoso now! (Now imagine this edited into the post you just made for a more-apt comparison) If you do work at MS, I cannot believe any person involved legit thought it was "just a tip and nobody will mind
376.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Fair enough. I would just interpret this as an exaggeration / way of speaking. In the end you always have to trust someone, be it Mullvad's reputation, be it an auditor, be it a hardware vendor Good comparison about the SGX contac
377.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Maybe this comment downthread helps for the email problem? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489711
378.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Also based on your reply on a sibling thread, is this a legit question (you expect that there is a way but you're not sure how) or are you just waiting for someone to bite just so you can state your case about proving a negative?
379.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Can recommend Runbox for a lot of reasons, but one gotcha that bothered me in day-to-day use was that emails are delayed by a minimum of 30 seconds, with no real upper bound, just a probability curve with, say, the 90th percentile around 5
380.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
When first migrating away from Hotmail as a teenager, I just registered for new accounts/contracts on my own domain and migrated only the stuff I was still actively using At some point I downloaded the emails from Hotmail by adding the
381.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Somehow this reminds me of the time I downloaded, compiled, and ran a Bitcoin miner with the app called Linux Deploy on my then-new Galaxy Note (the thing called phablet that is now positively small). It ran terribly, but it did run! Having
382.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
RHEL isn't Linux either then?
383.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
If there were a reliable way of identifying people making multiple accounts, it wouldn't be anonymous now would it? This not a loophole but inherent to an anonymous system The trouble is, the accounts aren't meant to be anonymous.
384.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Care to elaborate then? It's in line with the announcements I've heard
385.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Not quite. You can do a lot of stuff that requires no permissions, or at least not ones that the user has to confirm (e.g. you get internet permission, sensor access, always run in the background etc. by default, but you do need to declare
386.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Is this in AOSP? I was assuming the changes are to GMS. I should hope that no distributor of AOSP(-based) images include this code anyway so it's just on the google devices
387.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
So like a Motorola, Sony, Fairphone, Shiftphone, Jolla... none of these are 'completely locked down' (though besides Jolla, they're all a little: they don't come as "yours" by default because of the contract wi
388.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
- NewPipe (I'm not sure if you wanted to edit in entries or if this was our cue :D)
389.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
Why not grab Fennec from f-droid as well? It used to also have more features, I'm not sure if that's still the case but might as well go with the open source build
390.
▲
by
Aachen
7mo ago
> Why those apps are not in a store? Why'd I put my app into their store if I don't agree with the store owner's policies?
More ›