A_No_Name_Mouse

10 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   Correct, there are a few objects that are spectacular. However they don't change much in time. So the novelty wears off pretty quickly. After seeing them a couple of times my telescope is now collecting dust in the attic.
2. 62.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   Why would they encode the ip in transactions sent to an address instead of from an address? Anyone can send BTC to an address, while only the botnet operators would be able to send from it. Then it would be unlockable.
3. 63.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   Thanks. In this context it makes perfect sense.
4. 64.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   Your comment resonates with me but I'm not sure I fully understand it: "compliance transfers risk out of the project and onto the standard/model": If I choose to be compliant to a standard, some of the risks are mitigate
5. 65.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   I don't understand the title of this article. The combination of "2021" and "still" implies that something happened that makes this policy nonsense given the current state of affairs. Did I miss something?
6. 66.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   I'm in the EU and clicked agree before I realised the implications. Now I want to withdraw my consent, but there doesn't seem to be a way to do this. Am I overlooking something or is that not possible (which would violate GDPR)?
7. 67.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   > The solar system passes through the crowded part of our Milky Way galaxy about every 30 million years. How is that possible? At our sun’s distance from the center of the Milky Way, it’s rotating once about every 225-250 million years [
8. 68.▲
   De Correspondent pulls plug on English service as readers don’t renew membership(dutchnews.nl)

   2 points by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago|0 comments
9. 69.▲
   by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

   If you're interested, my mother in law is for sale. Very cheap but she comes with a no return policy.
10. 70.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    "Hits back"? They just state they don't agree without giving any reasoning.
11. 71.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Is there any advantage in using this method over HMAC with the key stored in the HSM, without pepper or salt? It seems overly complex to me but I'm not a cryptographer.
12. 72.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    If they're going after individual sites, could a 'workaround' be to keep switching domain names with a suffix like the week number? With a redirect on the main site to the site of the week. It would require new takedown notic
13. 73.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Thanks. I'm not a developer so I guess it's relevant, just not for me.
14. 74.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    A compony moves their code repository to a different provider. Honest question: why is this news worthy? Am I missing something?
15. 75.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    I would have expected a responsible disclosure timeline, but it looks like he didn't report this to MS
16. 76.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    https://outline.com/sG2n47 for reading without signing up
17. 77.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    I can see how that works for an internal network. How does this work for SaaS solutions that would normally be directly on the internet? Would they have to be "shielded" to be on a private network and somehow be "Boundary ena
18. 78.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Wonderful video, really clear!
19. 79.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Is there a simple paper that explains how this works on a technical level? I have a hard time visualizing how a connection to a remote host would be set up if it runs through Boundary. Does "without requiring direct network access&quot
20. 80.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    "Instead, Dr Nabarro is advocating for a new approach to containing the virus.". Too bad the article does not mention what the alternative is. The article feels like a hollow statement.
21. 81.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Very much deserved, but why does it take so long to award this prize? Clearly they could have valued this research 20 years ago?
22. 82.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    > He has yet to come up with testable predictions. Let alone trying to test them. Only then there might be a point in listening to the rest. He is not presenting this as a scientific theory. This is a keynote speech for NASA folks. Just
23. 83.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Just stop holding the spacebar or disable spacebar heating :-) https://xkcd.com/1172/
24. 84.▲
    On doing glue work in a team(noidea.dog)

    4 points by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago|1 comments
25. 85.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    A really good explanation of the bow tie method can be found on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpGKHncw-d8 Though I can see it helps in the analysis of a specific event, I feel to grasp how to use it to map risks a priori
26. 86.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Good to see these companies finaly switched to open source software...
27. 87.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Let's see if they accept GPT-3 generated articles :-)
28. 88.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    This happened in 1999/2000, maybe someone could add (2000) to the title?
29. 89.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    Title might be a bit misleading: they disappear against the black background, it's not that their numbers are diminishing.
30. 90.▲
    by A_No_Name_Mouse 6y ago

    And of course a link to the relevant XKCD: https://xkcd.com/2014/