ASneakyFox

10 ms·

91.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I don't think it's do much a company could the over reddits marketshare. Its that there's comment sections and forums every where. If/when reddit dies there will be increased traffic to other forms of blogging/comme
92.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I like the idea though I'm on opera. Edit: oh and it requires google login. No thanks.
93.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I don't think reddit can be profitable. The moment it is the userbase will move on to the next thing. A new site can spring up over night. A new reddit could be coded in weeks. its all a matter of people choosing to congregate there. T
94.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
The problem is like its asking you what your favorite type of glue is. Favorite hammer. Favorite color. Favorite grade of gasoline. Unless you have some weird emotional attachment to the subject it makes no sense.
95.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
Because it's not a privacy issue. Privacy is the red herring. There's already ways to protect your privacy online. Additionally no one wants online privacy. People spend long hours making their facebook page
96.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
The issue is not data location. Its that their localized domain for europe does but their international domain does not. Googles argument is their international domain doesn't fall under european jurisdiction.
97.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
News papers are going digital. Google search engines is how many people get their news (searching news web sites)
98.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
Censorship contradicts freedom. To me its that's simple.
99.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
The article is clickbait spam.. youre not supposed to respond.
100.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I don't think hes argueing of the whole web.. hes talking about javascript. Eg websites that could and perhaps should be apps. This is different from a website that provides information.
101.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I think because you can't hear what they're saying so it feels like whispering. And whispering is often negative.
102.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I don't see the problem with "clones". No one ever cries clone outside of the industry. Pepsi isnt considered a coke clone. Reebok isn't a nike clone. And so on. So as long the "clone" isn't impersonating
103.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I like how he discusses the importance of building credibility, but in his article he gives nothing to tell me why I should listen to his advice or why his advice might help any one do well in their career.
104.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
Anything you consume in any way could be a drug depending on how you classify it. Typicaly the term drug implies some thing negative while terms like nutrition and medicine implies some thing positive. Its all politics though.
105.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
What about those that disable js because you didn't test your js on their mobile browser and it renders the site unusable?
106.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
It can be very useful and be used to add useful features.. but 90 percent of javascript is for delivering unwanted annoyances like ads... or when not malicious it can be used to annoy. making what looks like ordinary links to unexpected thi
107.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
Being that both are popular and it's common to see both, you really ought to know both.
108.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
That part made me laugh. Including "objects and classes" on a programmers resume is like a trucker including "steering and accelerating" on his. Unfortunately the person who is going to hire you often has no programming
109.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
That's not so easy to do any more.
110.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I'm not saying its not legitimate copyrightable work. I'm saying the claims are hard to verify. There's no content id for closed source code. There's not even manual identification or just skimming to see if the claim mi
111.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I had no idea dmca could be used for source code. I feel like the merits of the claim could require argument. It's not like media where you're very clearly using some ones so g or picture.
112.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
They were dating and they broke up. This is all a teenager break up story. Just they have the money and publicity to tell the whole world about it. Hes still guilty of harassment. But I'm sure if more records were released We would see
113.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
The method comments are where you explain the expected/accepted inputs and outputs. Its not for outlining design decisions. You also don't need to explain how the method works. It's a black box. Your ide can be configured to
114.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
The whole thing sounds like an episode of some reality tv show with teenagers. Both of them should be feeling embarassed about themselves.
115.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
This is way over blown out of proportion beyond belief. It's not like they blocked off peoples access to food, they choose not to highlight some ones status update. The true story is how did face book get to the point that crituqing it
116.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I'm pro privacy. But the law is just stupid. Its about taking information that is meant to be public knowledge (much of it being public for good reasons, eg lawsuits) and saying that the information should still exist just be hard to f
117.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
None of my java classes are this that long. 3 words max.
118.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I agree with this concept as names are meaningless. But id like to throw in that if you're looking for corporate work then your title is important as the people hiring you don't usually understand what you do, so just explaining y
119.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I solved this issue by never unmuting my phone. Not even for phone calls (unless im expecting an important call). My phone doesn't tell me when to use it. I do it the other way around. I check my phone maybe 2-3 times a day. When I wak
120.
by ASneakyFox 12y ago
I feel like under score just makes your code compact. They're also ignoring that I might want to be doing input validation while iterating over those lists. Forcing me to add a loop right after that very compact code and nullifying it

More ›