ABCLAW

71 ms·

1. 811.▲
   by ABCLAW 10y ago

   I think this is a valid concern, but one that applies to most media. In my field, I often see pieces circulated which are incorrect with facts sourced from less precise colleagues of mine. I don't believe the piece was not 'newswo
2. 812.▲
   by ABCLAW 10y ago

   Maciej, I have tremendous respect for you. What follows is a long post, so please don't feel like I am beating up on you - I am responding to a few things in this thread. --- This wasn't negligent disinformation (post-revision of
3. 813.▲
   by ABCLAW 10y ago

   There's a continuing thread through these 'fake news' and 'new journalism' discussions, namely that there is a need for express interference in information circulation. This is premised upon the notion that there is
4. 814.▲
   by ABCLAW 10y ago

   Reading your post reminded me of a post you submitted a month ago on the same topic: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13124415 I think the previous post is a gem and will be helpful for readers.
5. 815.▲
   by ABCLAW 10y ago

   Negligence is a stand-alone tort/cause of action in civil litigation, as well as a qualifier for intention-based infractions in criminal law. The two meanings to the term are connected, but do not overlap 1:1. The poster above you is c