9wzYQbTYsAIc

7 ms·

31.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
If engineering owns quality, it ought to also own the liability, too. That would put the damper on the pipe dream pretty quick. Probably more healthily than any data center ban could ever do. If engineers were licensed, bonded, and liable,
32.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
> I don’t understand the reasoning here why QA shouldn’t be engineering. Who watches the watcher, right? That aside, the core idea is the same as the principles of independent audit, peer review, or even simply just specialization. Red t
33.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
> Have engineering own quality The moment that happens it will either be re-outsourced to QA anyways or quality will become a question of licensing and bonding of professional engineers
34.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
> Hardware is going to be expensive for awhile but its not as dire as the article makes it out to be. At the same time, the article’s argument that the value of personal computer ownership is only going to rise, in terms of the value of
35.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Virtual desktop casting, a killer HID product, and what else do you need?
36.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Politics of solar, at work
37.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
The mindset shift towards “how many hours of computer usage did that one panel enable” is like the mindset shift from learning calculus, in some ways. Not quite a paradigm shift, but you gain a new appreciation for conservation of use when
38.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
>> Opinions are my own obvs. > Whose else would they be? takes a look at the user profile Oh, they are a journalist/writer for a big name outfit
39.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
I don’t recall if IFTTT had/has a basic cron or not, but it sure has/had put a lot of basic automations in the hands of the general public. Same for Apple Shortcuts, to some extent, or Zapier.
40.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Out with the old, in with the GNU.
41.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
> Toss a fair coin until the number of heads exceeds the number of tails. This determines a stopping time. What is the probability that this stopping time is even? Claude Code did pretty well: > Zero. > > The stopping time alwa
42.
Show HN: A2A-Psychology [v0.1] – Agent2Agent Extension Idea(github.com)
1 points by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago|0 comments
43.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
it still takes the agents time to build correct software, in my experience
44.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
#HolyShit
45.
Ask HN: Did Claude Code just bump Opus default to 1M context?
5 points by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago|3 comments
46.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
For me, personally, I'm building things that would have been impractical for me to do as cleanly within the same amount of time - prototypes in languages that I don't have the muscle memory for, using algorithms i have a surface l
47.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Ah, this is true - for my purposes, I've been directing the design and deliberating on the constraints and specifications for a larger system in tandem with smaller planning sessions. That has worked well so far, but yes, you are total
48.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Nice! Will take a look at this for my homelab - was debating using crawl.cloudflare.com to try it out, as browser rendering was my next stretch goal.
49.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Thanks! I'm just now at the point of having done a manual human-in-the-loop test once, still working through core bugs, etc., so haven't had a chance to notice bottlenecking, but i'm using github issues for the moment as the
50.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
90% easy or 90% average?
51.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
This. Claude Code wrote a blog article for me documenting a Gemini interaction that I manually operated. I found it quite interesting - the difference in "personalities", and the quality of Claude's output is stark in compar
52.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
With Claude Code now having a /plan mode - you can take your time and deliberate through architecture and design, collaboratively, instead of just sending a fire-and-forget. Much less buggy and saves time if you keep an eye on the out
53.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
https://github.com/safety-quotient-lab/psychology-agent <- I've been exploring ways to track decisions, making some interesting findings, at the homelab scale, at least. The cognitive architecture, so to speak,
54.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Interesting, thanks for sharing. I've been doing some DIY/citizen science type agent orchestration as well: https://blog.unratified.org/2026-03-06-receiving-side-agent-... Not quite to the same scale, but I share
55.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Yeah, just paste it in there - the LLM will figure it out. Play with it if you want to tweak the formatting - you could try JSON instead, but for readability I went with YAML.
56.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
persona: fair witness https://fairwitness.bot/
57.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
https://github.com/safety-quotient-lab/psychology-agent Something along the lines of auto research is what I have in mind for this psychology agent. It is currently working on training a model, with handholding right n
58.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Very nice, thank you. This will come in handy for a scientific agent I am working on.
59.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
That’s an insight that a project I’m working on has built upon: https://unratified.org/connection/ai/higher-order-effects/#1... Education and training and entry level work build judgement.
60.
by 9wzYQbTYsAIc 7mo ago
Seems like a good time to enshrine human rights and the social safety net by ratifying the ICESCR ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Covenant_on_Econ ...) and giving human rights the teeth they need. I used An

More ›