99_00

60 ms·

691.
by 99_00 6y ago
Especially if there is a crash.
692.
by 99_00 6y ago
The precedent was set with proTrump groups and people. Any group or person who attracts negative attention must go. Not worth the business risk. Politicians are eager to make even apolitical issues partisan. The outrage driven media is happ
693.
by 99_00 6y ago
Better to have 1 star and stay open than to be shutdown one way or another. Music, taxis, retail, newspapers, politics and others have been disrupted by technology and the incumbents have suffered. The establishment players have all seen th
694.
by 99_00 6y ago
I'd ban them too. Not worth my company being dumped by their cloud provider or the app being banned because they ruffled the wrong feathers. The parlor lesson has been learned. I won't stick my neck out for principle when it ends
695.
Retail traders make up nearly 25% of the stock market(markets.businessinsider.com)
3 points by 99_00 6y ago|0 comments
696.
by 99_00 6y ago
The problem I have isn't that a hedge fund screwed up. It isn't even with WSB. The problem I have is that this seems to be another red flag that we are in the late stages of a bull market. The point where, at least according to fo
697.
by 99_00 6y ago
Everything that's happening right now reminds me of the 'day trading' craze in 2000.
698.
by 99_00 6y ago
What is the single, most persuasive argument against Wallstreetbets?
699.
by 99_00 6y ago
Just to be clear, you aren't disagreeing with the argument he is making in this clip? Correct?
700.
by 99_00 6y ago
Institutional investor and hedge funds aren't the same thing. It's my understanding that the shorts were put on by hedge funds. As far as I know institutional investors can't short stocks.
701.
by 99_00 6y ago
>wsb just merely launched a fashion Seems like launching a fashion is a significant ability.
702.
by 99_00 6y ago
I've found immediately useful information and look forward to digging deeper into the content. Thank you so much for this. Your site is exactly what's been missing for me for so long.
703.
by 99_00 6y ago
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1353728390268940288
704.
by 99_00 6y ago
As a passenger, how noisy are the planes?
705.
by 99_00 6y ago
But what is the reason you think he is "loosing his mind"?
706.
by 99_00 6y ago
You aren't disagreeing with me.
707.
by 99_00 6y ago
There are cheaper and faster combustion sports cars.
708.
by 99_00 6y ago
How? What do they do that cheaper combustion cars don't?
709.
by 99_00 6y ago
If it's about externalities then there is a ceiling on the taxes. Because combination isn't infinitely bad. If it's about revenue, taxing combustion engines gets less attractive the smaller the market becomes especially if it
710.
by 99_00 6y ago
I'm not aware of a strong functional benefit of electric versus combustion. But digital cameras had strong benefits over digital, so I don't think it's a good analogy. In general, I don't think analogies are for making a
711.
by 99_00 6y ago
>They'll probably increase as gas motor cars are phased out before the process ever sink too low. Why?
712.
by 99_00 6y ago
>This isn't entirely true. The cost of gas has a hard floor due to the cost of extracting oil from the ground. Nobody is spending $40 a barrel to extract oil that's selling for $25 a barrel. So if oil demand falls and prices fa
713.
by 99_00 6y ago
I don't understand how this can happen. An equilibrium seems more likely to me. If massive amounts of people move to electric vehicles gas prices will fall. This will make combustion vehicles more attractive. Also, government depends o
714.
by 99_00 6y ago
People move to a neighbourhood because of the way it is. Outside forces want to change the way the neighbourhood is. People in the neighbourhood resist the change. Why does this situation invite pejorative terms and scorn from people who ha
715.
by 99_00 6y ago
I don't understand. Is this a sarcastic jab at the product, or reviewer. Or is it genuine surprise that the product isn't what was expected? I haven't herd of AirPod Max until now, so I'm not in the same context as you.
716.
After 55 years, Pecos Jane Doe identified(dnasolves.com)
4 points by 99_00 6y ago|0 comments
717.
by 99_00 6y ago
Interesting history, and the subtext seems to be that this is precedence for deleting Trump from social media. But the connection isn't presented, it is assumed. And in my opinion, doesn't exist. >As a media historian, I find m
718.
by 99_00 6y ago
EARLY FRONTIERS FOR COMPUTER CREATIVITY: TX-0 WRITES A WESTERN https://computerhistory.org/blog/early-frontiers-for-compute...
719.
by 99_00 6y ago
https://project-evidence.github.io/
720.
by 99_00 6y ago
I see this story as extremely positive. Technology can bring closure to unknown number of families. Many cold cases will be solved. This is just the start. >A genomics company, Othram, had taken his DNA and started to do cutting-edge gen

More ›