93po

25 ms·

421.
by 93po 2y ago
Literally at the top of the page: > Tesla Deaths is a record of Tesla accidents that involved a driver, occupant, cyclist, motorcyclist, or pedestrian death, whether or not the Tesla or its driver were at fault Even the FSD stat says &q
422.
by 93po 2y ago
I would agree if one of those 55% had an immigration issue it could be HN related. But you can find stats like that to support literally anything belonging on HN.
423.
by 93po 2y ago
this is factually just not true, at all. like outrageously not true. why would you just completely make something up like this?
424.
by 93po 2y ago
Google being forced to sell would cost them billions of dollars. It makes sense that Google would spend at least tens of millions of dollars trying to convince the public at large that this is bad. I don't know the author but he's
425.
by 93po 2y ago
i really don't understand this argument. at which point is it violating copyright versus an intelligence learning and making content the same way as humans? it was living cells, but they worked as transistors, would it be ok? it was wh
426.
by 93po 2y ago
It's disappointing that the EFF is getting into partisan politics instead of staying out of it. Trump sucks and I'm not defending him, but it's really tiresome when people quote him and infer meaning that he super obviously d
427.
by 93po 2y ago
Literally any bad actor with half a brain cell assumes every large american tech company has been served a NSL. Disallowing them from disclosing they received one seems pretty pointless and only done to prevent bad optics and public opinion
428.
by 93po 2y ago
There is absolutely no reason why the public at large can't know that some three letter agency is legally forcing a company to provide information with a national security letter. The public knowing that this is happening doesn't
429.
by 93po 2y ago
the average forest service salary is over $100k. salaries are barely 15% of their total budget. if they're overworked and underpaid then it's a management issue, not a funding issue.
430.
by 93po 2y ago
the US forest services has a budget of 9 BILLION dollars a year. in 2023 less than a billion of that was salaries. if they're understaffed it's entirely a management problem, not a funding problem. especially because in 2024 they
431.
by 93po 2y ago
you could install some vigilante speed bumps maybe
432.
by 93po 2y ago
dang recently replied to a comment i made with similar sentiment, and i understand his perspective: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42993714
433.
by 93po 2y ago
i downvote comments that some might interpret as “i disagree with this” downvoting, but in reality, i downvote comments that shoehorn in a contentious opinion only loosely related to the topic, usually because the commenter has an axe to gr
434.
by 93po 2y ago
i think people focus on whether backups are encrypted too much. it really doesn't matter when the government has remote access equivalent to your live phone when it's in an unencrypted state, which they almost certainly do.
435.
by 93po 2y ago
i had to use it when amazon was a client of my employer and it was hot garbage in my opinion
436.
by 93po 2y ago
i dont want to tie identities, basically just go follow actual researchers at frontier AI labs and close to nothing else and it'll be a close approximation
437.
by 93po 2y ago
the particles stick via static electricity, which doesn't work well on wet surfaces like your lungs. the bigger issue is that ionizers can mix with VOCs from cleaning products and generate ozone and formaldehyde as byproducts - i suspe
438.
by 93po 2y ago
its the only social media platform that isn't image and video heavy, can consistently have non-bot and non-fake and non-clickbait material of substance (if you curate who you you follow well), provides awesome filtering options out of
439.
by 93po 2y ago
EVs use different tires from the factory than regular cars to help increase efficiency, maybe it's about the type of tire?
440.
by 93po 2y ago
do you have an air filter with an ionizer by chance? those will also do that
441.
by 93po 2y ago
If that's begging then signing up for literally any website is begging the website for an account
442.
by 93po 2y ago
So my other recent comment on this, I strongly disagree that this is even-handed writing
443.
by 93po 2y ago
Knowledge about the technical concepts means nothing if we're not getting real, meaningful information about what's actually happening. It's all rampant and unfounded speculation at this point.
444.
by 93po 2y ago
Okay, so he's speculating without evidence, which is effectively the definition of hyperbole, which makes for really boring and uninteresting reading
445.
by 93po 2y ago
HN has tackled this just fine for a very long time. I think it will be ok.
446.
by 93po 2y ago
5 CFR Part 351 specifically allows RIFs due to budget cuts, reorgs, or lack of work. Though the RIFs have to be done with certain considerations. Ultimately it is allowed for some reasons, and it's really up to the courts to decide if
447.
by 93po 2y ago
I think it's working as intended in terms of HN not being a place for partisan issues and discussion in the vast majority of cases. There's literally an automatic downvoting of submissions where the comment to vote ratio is too hi
448.
by 93po 2y ago
His first sentence is: > In the span of just weeks, the US government has experienced what may be the most consequential security breach in its history Which is a ridiculous level of hyperbole and just factually not even close to accurat
449.
by 93po 2y ago
There are so, so many posts on HN about this and they're getting flagged, I would guess, because people can see this content on literally any corporate news site or a million different subreddits, and there's not much value to it
450.
by 93po 2y ago
i think they're especially likely to hallucinate when asked to cite sources, as in they're mostly prone to making up sources, and a lot of the work my lawyer friend have asked of chatgpt or claude requires it to cite stuff, and my

More ›