867-5309

45 ms·

1. 751.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   DNR (Digital Noise Reduction in this instance) has in the medical world another meaning of Do Not Resuscitate. I'm sure this will tickle those opposed
2. 752.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   let the spoon cool before injecting
3. 753.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   *shouldn't
4. 754.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   the dolphins disagree
5. 755.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   >This is most annoying when the site wants me to type in my email address to unsubscribe. I've become increasingly suspicious of this practice if my email address is in the URL, why don't you autofill that email box for me? if
6. 756.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   that's the author, not the reference
7. 757.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   I know the name, but what's the reference? edit: ah wait, is it the thin slices?
8. 758.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   population: 47, according to wikipedia
9. 759.▲
   by 867-5309 5y ago

   I see, so NAT traversal over SSH as opposed to VPN/DDNS
10. 760.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    for this to work device-agnostically presumably there is a URL scheme such as "wifi://", can anyone confirm?
11. 761.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    a required module of a course
12. 762.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    >get around NAT at the ISP level genuinely interested in the benefits of this. care to share?
13. 763.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    I thought it would be something impressive like somehow using the obtained salt for further powering of the device but nope, another clickbait trip into bullshitland
14. 764.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    so they're 95% sure.. how do they even come up with a figure like that? they didn't bother saying. might be equivalent to 'give or take a few trillion tonnes'
15. 765.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    not if your email address and browser sessions contain no personally identifiable information
16. 766.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    that's cool. I get the impression they're not really interested in monetising or data mining if all these loopholes exist, and that their platform is supported by those who wish to engage in microtransactions, which do not hinder
17. 767.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    I use an ad blocker so have never seen an ad on Reddit
18. 768.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    for Reddit, you can "sign up" with a bogus email address and still interact (browse, join, comment, vote, message) freely. the only possible downside is it asks you to verify your email address every launch, but I don't see t
19. 769.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    first rule of sneaker bot club..
20. 770.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    indeed. ~$0.15 per captcha for >$200 sneakers is nothing. it may be shady but people are making a living filling out captchas all day. "Want easy stable income? All you need is a computer!"
21. 771.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    growing up in the UK stuck with 56Kbps modems, when prompted to select network speeds I remember seeing things like ISDN (128Kbps) and T1/T3 Cable (1Mbps) and thinking wow, those Americans have lightning Internet
22. 772.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    those on the first page of search engine results are more likely to command a higher price. I wonder how much time it would take to reconcile the investment with ads, and likely a reduced userbase. probably years
23. 773.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    ah I thought you meant without ads
24. 774.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    I meant visitors would be deterred by the sudden infestation of ads, not that page ranking would decrease. if anything it would probably increase also, how would a search engine visit make money?
25. 775.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    I'd imagine hosting would not be resource-heavy so <$2/mo, that's why sites like these don't really need ads as the cost of hosting is negligible. is there any way of generating revenue other than plastering a load of
26. 776.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    a great quote -- thanks for this
27. 777.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    you know you're in a flat country when "one of the highest natural points" is 147m!
28. 778.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    I'm sure anything Intel can do AMD can match or better, the numbers can only skew so far. plus that's just some random guy on youtube's spin. the website also holds masses of aggregated data for loads of other hardware, which
29. 779.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    Texan cats greet with "meowdy"
30. 780.▲
    by 867-5309 5y ago

    maybe the "reviews" should never be read? I can't say I've ever read any. I just go there to compare hardware benchmarks as the website name indicates. if you go there looking for reviews then more fool you. they're