7bit

45 ms·

871.
by 7bit 2y ago
> It's not like anyone actually writes an l like that Excuse me?!
872.
by 7bit 2y ago
I skimmed the article, so maybe that's why I didn't get it. But isn't the headline misleading? They didn't fall in love and there is no indication that doing all of what they did would make someone fall in love - that ot
873.
by 7bit 2y ago
> My biggest frustration with .internal is that it requires a private certificate authority So don't use it?
874.
by 7bit 2y ago
Adding energy usage limits is much more complicated than you make it sound. And it would impact many more use-cases than cryptocurrency. It's much easier to ban crypto-usage and lose a hand full of customers, than implementing limitati
875.
by 7bit 2y ago
Man I love systemd. Never has it been easier for me to setup a binary as a service. I dread the memories of customizing or writing init scripts and dependencies. I don't get all the hate, that primarily argues about the philosophy of L
876.
by 7bit 2y ago
I appreciated it. I fucking hated all these init scripts and find it muuuuuch easier to get services running under systemd. I don't care about philosophy when it gets in my way of managing systems.
877.
by 7bit 2y ago
DSCv3 is compatible to v2, except with MOF files, in my understanding. You can continue to use PowerShell with it. I can only speculate, but since there is no more LCM, a binary was needed to properly run DSCv3 on your machine.
878.
by 7bit 2y ago
DSCv3 is compatible to v2, except with MOF files, in my understanding. You can continue to use PowerShell with it. I can only speculate, but since there is no more LCM, a binary was needed to properly run DSCv3 on your machine.
879.
by 7bit 2y ago
I see a lot of misinformation in your post. 1. I'm loosely following the development for DSC (v3 or v2-tooling) and never have I heard Steve Lee, Michael Greene or Michael Lombardi advocate DSC as an alternative to GPOs. 2. How do you
880.
by 7bit 2y ago
Do you think the test is written and the bug left in? What a weird take. And then, you write the test so that future changes (small or big) that causes regressions get noticed before the regression is put into production again. Especially i
881.
by 7bit 2y ago
Will try it. But it shouldn't need that in the first place. It's just bad UX
882.
by 7bit 2y ago
I also use sep= annotation. That is not documented ANYWHERE by Microsoft I assume one of the devs mentioned this in a mailing-list sometime in the nineties and it has found its way around. Still... Shame on Microsoft of not documenting thi
883.
by 7bit 2y ago
> Without these agreements, we don’t have any say or knowledge of how our data is displayed and what it’s used for ... I know that per EULA (or whatever it's called) the contributions we do on reddit become their data. However, read
884.
by 7bit 2y ago
GitHub repost are taken down all the time because they offer means to violate EULAs. See youtube-dl which was taken down couple of months back.
885.
by 7bit 2y ago
> 3. The only time my wife complains is when she wants a solution. Because she thinks complaining for no reason is for lazy people. I want to offer a different perspective. I sometimes complain that I live in an apartment that is too hot
886.
by 7bit 2y ago
It still is incompetence. That manager was incompetent.
887.
by 7bit 2y ago
I like the positivity that led to your suggestion. But I find it hard to follow the argumentation. They know that mistakes can take out thousands and thousands of devices, therefore it is imperative they prioritize stability over rollout sp
888.
by 7bit 2y ago
> * Alert volume: The number of alerts kept increasing over time. It was hard to maintain existing alerts. This would lead to a lot of noisy and unactionable alerts. I have lost count of the number of times I got woken up by alert that a
889.
by 7bit 2y ago
> So as a producer you have more expensive process and less consumer satisfaction... This is illogical. People buy decaf for several reason, that don't include it's taste. Either they're allergic to coffein, they get nervo
890.
by 7bit 2y ago
Have we gone full circle? Wasn't the point of OCSP to provide a low-latency and low-data alternative to CRLs, which might become massively huge?
891.
by 7bit 2y ago
You can't compare OAuth with SAML. OAuth is authorization and comes only ever after authentication, which is OIDC. But to respond to your critic: It is good that apps let you know that you are IN FACT not merely logging into something,
892.
by 7bit 2y ago
Why clunky? I can only talk about Microsoft, but they follow the specs and I found nothing clunky about it, because following the RFCs, everything worked exactly as expected .
893.
by 7bit 2y ago
Why clunky? I can only talk about Microsoft, but they follow the specs and I found nothing clunky about it, because following the RFCs, everything worked exactly as expected
894.
by 7bit 2y ago
I agree. I was merely stating the status quo. There was no decision to quit implementing SLO, the discussion was just stopped at one point.
895.
by 7bit 2y ago
While designed to accommodate many use-cases (which ist Not a bad thing), I'm curious what you seem overly complex? They're both pretty straight forward (except for single logout in SAML, which was never truly resolved and just le
896.
by 7bit 2y ago
While designed to accommodate many use-cases (which ist Not a bad thing), I'm curious what you seem overly complex? They're both pretty straight forward (except for single logout in SAML, which was never truly resolved and just le
897.
by 7bit 2y ago
So, ist it pronounced jiff or gif?
898.
by 7bit 2y ago
> When I receive a GPG encrypted email from a stranger, though, I immediately get the feeling that I don’t want to read it. Sometimes I actually contemplate creating a filter for them so that they bypass my inbox entirely, but for now I
899.
by 7bit 2y ago
Whenever I see a survey that does not give me options from a clear no to a clear yes, I already know that the survey only exists to push an agenda. Every option you give can somehow be used by the company to impose anything they want onto t
900.
by 7bit 2y ago
As per GDPR it is the data collector who has to reason why he needs that data, not the user who has to defend his privacy. The collector has to clearly articulate what is collected, how it is used and who processes said data. And the user h

More ›