77pt77

25 ms·

421.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Try doing it in 2002 with old hardware. Xorg took forever, especially the fonts for some reason.
422.
Building a Recursive DNS Resolver (2022)(timothya.com)
2 points by 77pt77 2y ago|0 comments
423.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Most likely it will just generate bullshit proofs, claim otherwise and then just flat out lie to your face.
424.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Are they comparing against opus using nolace? Because that makes all the difference!
425.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Where is the source code?
426.
by 77pt77 2y ago
No it doesn't. It could just be that some food is the catalyst to it, but not the cause.
427.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Died of a broken heart...
428.
by 77pt77 2y ago
When can we expect them to die in totally normal circumstances?
429.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Reminder that there is no quantitative test for schizophrenia despite the field overtly stating to be searching for one for over a century. Not even close.
430.
by 77pt77 2y ago
> which is like using Fabergé eggs to save money on an omelette I'm appropriating this!
431.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Maybe it's unenforceable, but they can make it very expensive for anyone to find out in more ways than one.
432.
by 77pt77 2y ago
It's more comfortable to play candy crush in your car than in some corner.
433.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Obstruction and then they would step on your foot and claim you touched them and add a charge for battery on a police officer.
434.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Physics is not math. Physics uses math.
435.
by 77pt77 2y ago
> he thought _Germans_ weren't sufficiently white for america in his 50s 50s! I repeat, 50s! This was no teen edgelord. This was a man in his 50s in a time when most people he grew up with didn't get any more life experience th
436.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Probably twitter or truth social or whatever. He strikes me as a good candidate for Q adjacent stuff also.
437.
by 77pt77 2y ago
> that people will basically end up at whatever social status they would be regardless of system So what determines that intrinsic and inevitable social status?
438.
by 77pt77 2y ago
People will read scientific information in ways to support their prejudices. Franklin would not be different. We like to idolize these historical figures but if this guy was alive nowadays he'd probably be rage posting in alt-right for
439.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Regular atmosphere is enough for that...
440.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Aurora australis are dimmer than aurora borealis.
441.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Why do you admire Wiles so much?
442.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Not only that. He was intellectual honest and technically exceptional.
443.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Also excels at destroying the cassandras if you will.
444.
by 77pt77 2y ago
I forgot to say, none were technically amazing, just good, one not even that but not awfull either. None had impressive intelligence either.
445.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Really? Google harasses anyone with a live linkedin profile. Getting to an onsite interview is a different matter though. I know 3 people at google, all senior, either SE or people managers. None had brilliant academic records. One took alm
446.
by 77pt77 2y ago
This beauty talk really needs to think. With the current status of research it's clear humans have a very problematic relation with what most people think the term means. A new word should really be crafted to disambiguate.
447.
by 77pt77 2y ago
How difficult is to run a glorified BBS over HTTP/HTML like that? Like seriously? It's not as difficult as the stuff being published there.
448.
by 77pt77 2y ago
I asked it to write code to calculate the arithmetic average of a list of ints in OCaml. It used only integer operators. Nowhere were floats involved. I asked "why is there no +. or /. operator" It completely bullshitted me s
449.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Never said it makes it ok. it's just ineffective.
450.
by 77pt77 2y ago
Like the institutions doing that consider themselves shackled by legality. Get real.

More ›