7373737373

7 ms·

91.
by 7373737373 1y ago
The new German government has not spoken out or acted against this (despite similar efforts having been ruled unconstitutional by its highest court)
92.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Patrick Breyer is doing god's work!
93.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Space Engine is excellent for this too
94.
by 7373737373 1y ago
correction: the green, not the purple ones
95.
by 7373737373 1y ago
On http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/ you can still see and listen to people using Morse code live in the purple amateur radio bands, usually on the lower frequencies (left part of the purple ranges)
96.
by 7373737373 1y ago
The grandparent comment wasn't mine, and I can kind of agree with yours. I can understand both of you, you in that the phrasing used may feel patronising. On the other hand, it is frustrating to know of a solution, of a good technical
97.
by 7373737373 1y ago
It's obvious you don't understand what is written in those links. The capability security architecture breaks the false dichotomy of either having to have a fully locked down or open operating system, it provides the technical f
98.
by 7373737373 1y ago
This is NOT (just) a social problem! See: supply chain attacks and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confused_deputy_problem No number of signature schemes and trust networks will be able to prevent the effects of actual m
99.
by 7373737373 1y ago
WebAssembly with its sandboxing-by-default paradigm is pretty much halfway there, just need a well defined interface to transfer data and access rights between instances, and creating new instances from others.
100.
by 7373737373 1y ago
THIS, a billion times, for every insecure device, every popular operating system running today, and every popular programming language. NONE of these systems were conceived or built with capability security in mind, none of them are even ap
101.
by 7373737373 1y ago
perhaps instead of peak artificial intelligence we will achieve peak natural dumbness instead?
102.
by 7373737373 1y ago
The consequences of this attitude of indifference (at best) will scale if Kagi becomes popular
103.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Yes, https://www.itelescope.net/
104.
by 7373737373 1y ago
This is the US not shooting itself in the foot or heart anymore, this one is going straight to the brain. Civilizational suicide.
105.
by 7373737373 1y ago
139.99€/month for something you can't even test first, lol
106.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Most LLMs I've tried come up with invalid reasoning, many confuse empirical evidence (of simulating it for a few steps and it 'most probably not halting') with definite proof that it never does, some create invalid probabilis
107.
by 7373737373 1y ago
for reference, the statement has been formalized in Lean in Deepmind's open problem database: https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures/blob/e...
108.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Interesting new contender for simplest to state unsolved problem: The Antihydra Does this program halt? a = 8 b = 0 while b != -1: if a % 2 == 0: b += 2 else: b -= 1 a += a//2 (&#x2
109.
by 7373737373 1y ago
> Do you have any thoughts on what a natural rewrite syntax would be? Not yet, but I'd probably prefer something that more explicitly indicated (in English, or some sort of more visually "pointing" indicator) which specifi
110.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Agreed - the Metamath base language (and its verifier) seem to be the most tractable of all I've seen, although it is probably still quite far away from the complexity of the high level language(s) that compile to it. Derived from it,
111.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Oh, I missed that, thanks! It would be cool to use this to visualize the current state and progress on, and depth of the "proof dependency graph"!
112.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Does Lean have some sort of verification mode for untrusted proofs that guarantees that a given proof certainly does not use any "sorry" (however indirectly), and does not add to the "proving power" of some separately gi
113.
by 7373737373 1y ago
One problem I have with learning Lean is that tactics - like rfl in the example - are overloaded, and their full semantics not completely explained/understandable from the tutorials. Unlike, say, C programming where one may understand
114.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Do they actually do this though? Or give the money to their owners/shareholders instead?
115.
by 7373737373 1y ago
Insurance is part of the problem - companies prefer to insure themselves rather than employ and support the research and development of secure software. As long as this is the more economical thing to do, nothing will change.
116.
by 7373737373 1y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperspectral_imaging
117.
by 7373737373 1y ago
They aren't - they are currently collating a repository of formalized open problems: https://github.com/google-deepmind/formal-conjectures
118.
by 7373737373 1y ago
He created a Youtube channel showcasing working alongside these tools: https://youtube.com/@TerenceTao27
119.
by 7373737373 1y ago
It would be interesting to see an international ranking of this
120.
by 7373737373 1y ago
If you can't judge that funding war criminals is a wrong action, you should reconsider your ability to do so morally Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, startup founders aren't exactly known for putting anything else above mone

More ›