725686

9 ms·

61.
by 725686 1y ago
I'm pretty sure there is a consensus among experts that every living organism has a single ancestor "organism". Life, as far as we know, originated only once on planet Earth.
62.
by 725686 1y ago
The advantage is obvious if you already use Swift.
63.
by 725686 1y ago
So, the only thing alchemists needed was a large particle collider. They were way ahead of their time.
64.
by 725686 1y ago
"The name paternoster ("Our Father", the first two words of the Lord's Prayer in Latin) was originally applied to the device because the elevator is in the form of a loop and is thus similar to rosary beads used as an ai
65.
by 725686 1y ago
For the 99% of programming I come across, I need about 0% math.
66.
by 725686 1y ago
I have never understood why people have hundreds, or even thousands of tabs. Why not use bookmarks? Hoarders.
67.
by 725686 2y ago
I haven't reade the article, but YES PLEASE.
68.
by 725686 2y ago
So you had to be "that" guy. I think it looks pretty cool.
69.
by 725686 2y ago
Not a criticism, but It stands out how all the researchers or employees in these videos are non native English speakers (i.e. not American). Nothing wrong with that, on the contrary, it just seems odd that the only American is Altman. Same
70.
by 725686 2y ago
6,000 years, according to Wikipeda. That is wild.
71.
by 725686 2y ago
Yes! I'm totally aware, but, for the first point, attacks are generally automated. If someone tries to find the pattern, you are being personally targeted and you have bigger problems. As per number 2, it is true and it sucks big time.
72.
by 725686 2y ago
I wish there was regulation for limiting what can go in the screen. Only the "new" stuff should go there. The rest, as it has always been, with easily accesible knobs and buttons. Even new stuff should be handled with voice comman
73.
by 725686 2y ago
I use a simple algorithm. So you don't actually remember the password, put the algorithm to produce the password for the site or service. Not perfect, but each passwords turns out to be unique (mostly). I don't know what experts t
74.
by 725686 2y ago
I am not a native English speaker (or English native speaker, ;)), but I've been using it forever...but didn't know there was an official adjective ordering.
75.
by 725686 2y ago
"If you can retire around 35-40" really? If you can retire that young, you probably don't need any advice.
76.
by 725686 2y ago
"cargo cult" really? Have you ever built maintained big a Java codebase? Spring is a marvel that sprang out of the experience of very, very talented people. It can be misused, of course, like any other technology, but it is a huge
77.
by 725686 2y ago
290 Java mentions but only 59 mentions of Spring?
78.
by 725686 2y ago
You should probably approach some of the people investigating this.
79.
by 725686 2y ago
So if they let you try a Ferrari for free, you wouldn't because you might like it but you can't afford it? I would, even if I know I could never buy one.
80.
by 725686 2y ago
Faster ye, just right click open in new tab. The annotation dots are not part of the image.
81.
by 725686 2y ago
So Rich Hickey is Richard Richard.
82.
by 725686 2y ago
I would also love to see this. I I'm very skeptic about this kinds of reconstructions based only on the remains.
83.
by 725686 2y ago
You might enjoy the book Junk DNA by Nessa Carey. Very interesting how complex and interrelated our DNA is. Pretty much spaghetti code.
84.
by 725686 2y ago
is on the move... approaching the actual geographic pole.
85.
by 725686 2y ago
I disagree. If the explanation is wrong it is good that someone points it out. You might not like the way they express this.
86.
by 725686 2y ago
Could you please point me where to buy it?
87.
by 725686 2y ago
"People do not just sit there thinking and then spitting out their best guess." Well, if you are using AI like this, you are doing it wrong. Yes AI is imperfect, fallible, it sometimes hallucinates, but it is a freaking time saver
88.
by 725686 2y ago
You might also enjoy minutephysics video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBcxuM-qXec
89.
by 725686 2y ago
No it is not. A bunch of pixels that form an image has nothing to do with stuff that was generated by evolution. Brains don't get assembled just by pushing together atoms or molecules at random, the evolved over eons going through a lo
90.
by 725686 2y ago
I find the idea of a Boltzmman brain ridiculous. It is impossible for a random interactions of particles form such complexity. I find Lee Cronin's assembly index a great argument against this. Complex things such as living organisms, a

More ›