67726e

13 ms·

61.
by 67726e 10y ago
There's also a lost nuke right off the coast off Tybee Island, Georgia near Savannah.
62.
by 67726e 10y ago
> It would perhaps be better if a domestic resistance could disrupt the Trump agenda before it gets to the point that it requires bravery in the face of death Will y'all stop ham-fistedly forcing your insane political beliefs into e
63.
by 67726e 10y ago
The Wiki entry[0] for the secure trucks reads like some kind of Tom Clancy fiction. They allegedly have automated weapons systems that will kill attackers even after all defenders become casualties. [0] - https://en.wikipedia.org
64.
by 67726e 10y ago
What's your point? They can help all the typical cases. If you need additional help, then you can find an accountant to help.
65.
by 67726e 10y ago
How so?
66.
by 67726e 10y ago
> some people perceive the US to be worse than China. Those people are dangerously ignorant.
67.
by 67726e 10y ago
> Unless you're brown. Yup, that's why we've never had a brown president.
68.
by 67726e 10y ago
Is that a Scandinavian thing, perhaps? My brother married into a Swedish family and his mother-in-law definitely loved that Swedish flag. Depending on the time of year you'd find she had Swedish flag tinsel, Swedish flag cocktail napki
69.
by 67726e 10y ago
One could argue it's inherent in a right to privacy.
70.
by 67726e 10y ago
No one needs a framework, but if one makes things easier then what is the problem? What, in your mind, is a good language that needs no framework?
71.
by 67726e 10y ago
What, specifically, about having a framework means the language is not expressive enough?
72.
by 67726e 10y ago
This was in the US, Pittsburgh, PA to be specific. However this was during the Vietnam war. Googling around, this sort of arrangement would make one ineligible from enlisting nowadays. There's an article referring to at least one case
73.
by 67726e 10y ago
No, he flat out said that a bunch of dudes with guns are not a deterrent in this day and age. If that's not what he said, let him speak for himself.
74.
by 67726e 10y ago
> It's air and naval power. Expensive and complex hi tech death machines. Afghanistan would beg to differ... > Of course, a 10m country will never have a really credible defense against nuclear super power Russia by itself. Unle
75.
by 67726e 10y ago
Anecdotally, it worked for my uncle. The judge gave him the option to join the Marines or go to prison. He chose the former and he ended up becoming a productive member of society.
76.
by 67726e 10y ago
It's not a language causing shitty abstractions, it's not a framework causing shitty abstractions. It's shitty developers. One can write a Java application and never touch XML, use AbstractFactoryWhateverTheFuck, and write sa
77.
by 67726e 10y ago
> just look it up. How about citing a source if you make a claim?
78.
by 67726e 10y ago
This story has nothing to do with Trump, his policies, or rhetoric. CBP tries to assess if a story is valid, this sounds like some kid who took a few classes being a dick. Stop trying to make every little thing about Trump because of your p
79.
by 67726e 10y ago
The tool would be a database, the use is a registry. Also, have you never heard of a census?
80.
by 67726e 10y ago
I work for a company in the cyber-crime / cyber-security space. We piss off criminals. We get attacked. We'll still never see half the shit the USG does, we'll still never see half the shit a Google or Facebook does. Stop pre
81.
by 67726e 10y ago
> It's not like some really unpopular celebrity said "They're my favorite company" Didn't the "delete Uber" campaign start the other week because of connections with the Trump administration? At least t
82.
by 67726e 10y ago
It's not excusing, it's providing context in a conversation about policy in the corporate, white collar, workplace. Bringing unrelated incidents into the conversation distracts from that.
83.
by 67726e 10y ago
Funny enough, the same could be said of your rebuttal.
84.
by 67726e 10y ago
Until you have proved something has happened, it must be assumed that it did not happen. There is no reason to assume something is true just because someone claims it happened. Especially when it is a claim that can severely damage reputati
85.
by 67726e 10y ago
I have no problem with describing one's alleged experience. I take issue with treating it as the truth, despite providing no evidence. This is all unsubstantiated hearsay.
86.
by 67726e 10y ago
Sure, but you've offered no argument regarding this particular situation.
87.
by 67726e 10y ago
What scares me is that there is no evidence, only allegation. Yet people are jumping on the bandwagon, making sure to pillory anything they disagree with in connection to an alleged incident. Guess what? People lie. Until some proof is offe
88.
by 67726e 10y ago
It would appear your analysis is marred by personal politics, as are most analyses of Trump.
89.
by 67726e 10y ago
Sounds like no nation wants undocumented labor because it is very problematic.
90.
by 67726e 10y ago
Rule of Law.

More ›