52-6F-62

6 ms·

31.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
You aren't alone. Not even a few years ago if you introduced a component to a system that would result in non-deterministic output... Hell, a single function... You would be named and shamed for it because it went against every princip
32.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
Look at their privacy policies. It absolutely is. They are harvesting video, voice, and much more.
33.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
God help us if Mark doesn't collect his fee between every one of our interactions, eh?
34.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
But do you really think they accidentally over-hired to the tune of tens of thousands of individuals? Across these companies the numbers are close to 100,000 people. Maybe much more. That means that a large number of high ranking people
35.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
That's when they encourage you to adopt their new implantable identification. Always on, always connected, always verified.
36.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
It's already happening with AI interview tools. Some of them have god-awful privacy policies that, depending on the interpretation, allow them to retain and use your likeness and voice for training their models or even marketing purpos
37.
50% of AI Data Centers Have Been Cancelled or "Delayed" [video](youtube.com)
2 points by 52-6F-62 6mo ago|0 comments
38.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
I don't owe you anything here.
39.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
The newspaper ads looking to capture my escaped ancestors who stole some shoes and ran away from their indenturement for Canada. https://www.masshist.org/beehiveblog/2013/05/advertising-in-... If you are look
40.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
So what you are saying is we can expect the number of accidental home-made chlorine-gas (and the like) toxic events go up.
41.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> the humanity as whole I think this 'pay for ads you are just lucky to be here' thing is a distinctly American invention...
42.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> chat content affects ads, which is the whole point. What happens when I am constantly violating usage terms by calling ChatGPT mean names for ignoring my explicit instructions and trying to turn everything into a trite creative writing
43.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
The same reasons the world needed AI for cats funded to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. How do you expect those precious people to do anything at all without a bi-yearly expenses-paid trip to Cabo and on-site baristas?
44.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> You have absolutely no sense of perspective. > metabolically expensive meat machines Calm down. There is no meat. It's just a giant sponge of wave packets. Your take is the most S.V. conformist one there is: materialist reduc
45.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> The Vogon constructor fleet is way overdue in my book Don't you see it? That's exactly what "AI" in this context is . It's the bypass. Where does it end, eh? Build a quantum "AI" that will end up jus
46.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> Instead, we got a ramble about how imperfect LLMs are right now. I wager this is a point that needs beaten into the common psyche. After all, it's been sold that it is not an imperfect tool, but the solution to all of our problem
47.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> But that's the whole appeal for bureaucrats. I don't think it's the bureaucrats. You should hear the Flock CEO talk. They have made it very public that their direct intent is to influence government policy in sweeping an
48.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
If this is super intelligence, then it follows we must all be super-duper intelligence.
49.
by 52-6F-62 6mo ago
> "stop me from shooting grandma." That is the most succinct manner I've seen this whole thing put.
50.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
Sounds a little like "OpenAI must protect itself against copyright infringement by any means necessary, including copyright infringement of everyone else"
51.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
Pretty sure the average Redditor is AI now.
52.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
There is a choice, yet.
53.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
And yet, the figures are the figures. I don't trust anonymous online mudslingers when I've seen the salaries of some of the midlevel AI roles. It all stinks. Worse yet: this person points to one article he disfavours and uses th
54.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
tick tock tick tock...
55.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
I think you should focus on the claims in this article. There are plenty of principles espoused within. Smearing his character without directly addressing those just stinks the place up.
56.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
I think Radiohead said that
57.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
Pointed and excellent. But I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for introspection from that camp. It seems that AI maximalists, like so many other players these days, see it as end-game time. There are no bounds or rules: pick a side, and
58.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
here: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/vGKC9LpGnOQ
59.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
Let's not forget who developed the tooling, platforms, frameworks, libraries and packages and so on that these news companies use. Nor the development practices that are hoisted as "the way to do things now" that people frant
60.
by 52-6F-62 7mo ago
According to some slop blog?

More ›