52-6F-62

28 ms·

451.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
You don't see this as Andy Warhol's concepts taken to their logical conclusion? I do.
452.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
TIL! This is great info
453.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I’ve used them professionally and personally for the past 3-5 years and I don’t have a bad experience to speak of. I haven’t run any large infrastructure, though. Mainly micro services and web sites—so mainly a couple of VPS instances, data
454.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
There's a lot of really special places there! Tofino is high on my list of must-visits. Each time we get out to the Island we don't really make it to the western coast. The only time I've been was down near Port Renfrew. Next
455.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
But they do impose it. The 40-hour workweek was a hard fought-for standard. I would call anything above that standard as imposing. It's not a rare concept. It's why billing for overtime at an increased rate is common practice—beca
456.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
True, and early Christian cults were often mixed up in offshoots of the mysteries traditions as well. So while the article mixes up which storied tree that image is supposed to represent, there's a real question of whether or not the s
457.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Of course they do: the priesthood. The Vatican itself restricts access to its own archives.
458.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
> in the service of company productivity This is the only thing I question, given the mix of data suggesting the opposite is true. Stanford ran a project about it some time ago: https://cs.stanford.edu/people/erobe
459.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Hey hey—I didn't say one way or the other whether it was a good thing or a bad thing. But I've been in and out of Google (Waterloo). They were there long, long hours often. Just the same, people seemed happy and fulfilled. I don&#
460.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Are you sure it's that simple? Google was previously known in the wider world for imposing longer than average work days under the guise of "you love it here at the office we have pingpong and rock climbing". It wasn't
461.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
> Also with Vue, you have community driven direction, rather than FB. This is a big positive for me. That was one of the top selling features for me as well. Not to disparage the large amount of work and thought and care that's go
462.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I've largely worked with Vue 2 in recent years over React. Primarily moved just to try and reduce front end bloat, and stuck because I preferred some of the patterns—personally I found them easier to reason around than some of the popu
463.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I was just there for a couple of weeks visiting my partner’s family in Comox. Her mother was telling us a bit about the work in the estuary while we were there—just a bit of the background that the article covers. At low tide you could see
464.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Reframe the question: is it slacking off or is it restorative mental break? Just speaking for myself, but I think better when I'm not pinched between two projects both demanding preference and priority over the other. I can maintain
465.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
It's really sad! Every time I visit I am more and more convinced I'd like to move out there. I think I'd be happier with more outdoors activities available, but man— it's unnerving. One of the more peculiar things I witn
466.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Personally? A deep wading into physics and philosophy. What are we even doing here and what, how, and why does it all work and be at all? I guess just trying to see the things for what they are, versus what you/I/we were told th
467.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I didn't introduce the philosophical notions myself. The author makes plentiful use of them, but inaccurately. That's worse than not using them. It's like pasting rm -rf / in an article about Fun Bash Commands.
468.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
We might be. But we also might not be. However we might be getting into dangerously personal territory there since we're approaching remarks on belief systems and people get pretty touchy about that kind of thing. I'm curious how
469.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I think I would recommend reading about some of those philosophies you consider "dead wrong" and how they came to be. Once you start to understand how they were formed in the first place, I think you would be less ready to deride
470.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
The author is making a lot of assumptions about fundamental matters of philosophy and human psychology. For instance, before we escape the first phrase in the section you quoted the author assumed that hard work and adversity run contradict
471.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Absolutely you can read it to death and still glean nothing from it. I don't know how many times I've had to reread, and I usually continue to do so. And to that end it takes more than just reading it, but if one wants to ask some
472.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
And people say studying humanities is useless... Before you can even begin to approach questions like this, you have to get a lay of the land at least... read an article on philosophy and religion in the encyclopedia. These aren't new
473.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Both are, but in their respective contexts.
474.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
Isn't that kind of what's described in physics? It's forces interacting all the way down.
475.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
No idea what you're saying. Who is "the chimp troupe"?
476.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
I don't know any better than you. I'm just reporting that OP's notions are already the core thread of some UFOlogists of the past ~40-50 years (and beyond). The idea that it is all essentially a projection/emanations fro
477.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
A human brain doesn't just stop operation if it lacks the physical appendages to interact with an exterior environment. I can only imagine, if such a posited earth-brain exists, that its entire functioning would be to continue function
478.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
It's pretty much the present background tale to the UFO/UAP scenarios: That every mythology, magical treatise, and religious, occult, or otherwise spiritual experience, UFO experience, etc, are all aspects of reality tuned to the
479.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
There's no question that there's some kind of vision involved, but what part of this is conceivably philanthropic? FB and Zuckerberg have an immediate vested interest in capturing the maximum of attention spans of these people.
480.
by 52-6F-62 5y ago
And taken to the extreme by groups like the Monroe Institute and their experiments with the U.S. D.O.D. on altered states of consciousness they state as a result of their method of synchronizing brainwaves between the two hemispheres akin t

More ›