Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
4ndrewl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
301.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Bending Spoons also bought Evernote. They seem to have a portfolio of "used-to-be-the-thing" products. Are they buying the products or users - they laid off the entire staff of Filmic after purchasing them.
302.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
It's theoretical Productivity Porn written by a student (check the about me page) who Wants To Be Remembered For Something.
303.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
I'd never heard of him and now I hear flags across the US will be at-half mast. He's was a billionaire-sponsored influencer if I understand it correctly?
304.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
I think it was humour. Taking the accusations of executive overreach by the president to absurd lengths.
305.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Gemini would have told them that...
306.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
If you're not vendoring, there's an argument to say that some portion of your source code is fair game to anyone who has commit rights to a variety of repos.
307.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Circular signs with a red outline are prohibition signs (ie you _must_ not do this). Triangular signs with a red outline are warning signs.
308.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
And I guess you can just withdraw your funding from him any time.
309.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
"Its output should be reviewed and validated for accuracy, especially for critical business decisions or reports." And I'd do that by writing out the function in Excel? :)
310.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
aka "it's a speed limit, not a target"
311.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
I think there is a hard limit on the number of in-flight requests (that is items that have been dequeued by a worker, but whose job has not been completed). I wouldn't be surprised if Reddit hit those sorts of volumes.
312.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Surely it's "the Mexicans" that are going to pay the tariffs? /s
313.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Gold and other commodities. The usual.
314.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Why do you think this? It clearly says that RBI fixed the issue on the day they it was found and disclosed. It seems pretty reasonable to publish, given that?
315.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Isn't that same resistance the thing that enables you to float in the first place though? I don't really swim so don't understand the analogy I'm afraid. The debt analogy works because you're taking a shortcut that
316.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
IME it's less than a "capture", more that most outside of academia don't have the requisite learning to be able to think in the abstract outside of trivial examples.
317.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
I mean, if there's one thing we know about Google - give it a few years and they'll ditch that thing they were _so_ into. Products, principles, whatever.
318.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
There's a difference between Free Speech - which is a power relation wrt the legislative branch, and freedom of consequences of your speech - which is a power relation wrt the executive.
319.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Saying anything bacon related in front of the pigs (slang for police) has _always_ been a sure fire way to wind them up and get your collar felt. You're only doing that if you're looking for a scrap.
320.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
You've misunderstood both of those examples, but it's unclear whether it's deliberate and you're just trying to be edgy.
321.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Your daily reminder that AI hallucination is a feature, not a bug.
322.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
The existence of a "winner-takes-all dynamic" suggests a market failure, not a marketplace.
323.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
> If your test is creating confidence in broken code with failing tests, it would be better for it to not exist. The author never considers the other option of fixing the flaky tests. I find this odd.
324.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
> My best wasn't good enough. I'm not good enough. This is not how to understand this. They may have been hiring for say 50 positions. They will just fill up those 50 positions with the people who reach a threshold, not stack-r
325.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
This sounds like a spoof LinkedIn post.
326.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
Arguably because people no longer talk about politics.
327.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
I dunno, at the place of work because that's where power is exercised - which is what politics is? But ok, let's not talk about Miguel who "no longer works here" or Sara who had to move to a different state.
328.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
That seems like an incredibly selfish way of thinking. You have everything to lose by _not_ talking about politics.
329.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
The politics example is from a very specific worldview. Would that be appropriate if your co-workers were being removed by ICE agents in front of you? That's a political act. Not speaking about politics is a luxury afforded to some bec
330.
▲
by
4ndrewl
1y ago
This article seems like it's very much lining up 'victim blaming' when things go wrong. "Look, we've taken all these precautions. Please don't use this for financial, legal, medical or "sensitive" inf
More ›