4b11b4

17 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   I've been dreaming of this in context of an established lesson as the root
2. 362.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   Absolutely not, but I'm far removed from any position to make a statement either way. I'm guessing there is some path to having breakthroughs in bio/chem/physics that is regarded as a possibility. Of course, if even poss
3. 363.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   Your prompts aren't good enough. Imagine you're writing to another person, you need to give them good context or else you wouldn't expect much from them either. edit: sometimes I also find myself in this state. Lately, instea
4. 364.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   Dario.. is one of the few people that we should actually be taking seriously... although I don't have anything other than my intuition to back this up. Maybe just Anthropic's direction, consistency, principles and vibe overall. ed
5. 365.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   Same, thought I had to hold or pull back on a ball
6. 366.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   Sign up for small company at bottom, find things to fix. Set timeline and expectations to leave in 9mo. By then you'll be running parts of the company. You may not actually want to do this long term, or it may be a nice side income. Pl
7. 367.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   This should be an extremely high profile piece of news... Imagine people all over planet Earth talking to each other in real life, in passing.. "Did you hear Internet access is cut off in ____"? Is there not some "tracker&qu
8. 368.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   This makes me feel better about a current situation, briefly.
9. 369.▲
   by 4b11b4 2y ago

   I've come back to this idea of "differences" from many angles... From images: information _is _ the differences between pixels From opinions: my opinion alone is worthless, but a difference of opinions? now we've got som
10. 370.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    This can be mostly mitigated with the right system prompt although I noticed occasionally the prompt will be ignored (~1/20).
11. 371.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    I don't understand most of the comments on this thread. They must not know about the built in restore points, git commits and diff, system prompts, and cursor rules. Yes, these models are merely approximations, but things aren't j
12. 372.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Imagine we spent this much effort on projects on the Earth.
13. 373.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    This needs to be the default way we instill in young people and to think about learning, as if, "escape your default setting" is akin to "exploration". Especially in the age of generated written word, the act of writing
14. 374.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    yes
15. 375.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Not with current architecture
16. 376.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Just emulating reasoning, though it seems to produce better results... Probably in the same way that a better prompt produces better results
17. 377.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Need multimodal and body and fully online. In the meantime strictly language audio and video will go pretty far
18. 378.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Ask for a refactor... Ask for multiple refactors and their trade-offs
19. 379.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    There's a Web4 already?
20. 380.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Should have seen my last sink install..
21. 381.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    but is it really reasoning? honest question re the underlying architecture of transformers also, self play seems quite an intuitive approach. There's another interesting paper from deep mind about play
22. 382.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    lolll
23. 383.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Why slack.. cuz it has huddles integrated? Just build on Zed at that point.
24. 384.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Have also been playing with the idea of "body dev for devs"... let's connect?
25. 385.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    My guess is because of the imprecision. It's an approximation. You don't feel that same sharpness that someone can cut through with carefully chosen words.
26. 386.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    I'm always asking Claude to propose a variety of suggestions for the problem at hand and their trade-offs, then evaluating them for the top three proposals and why. Then I'll pick one of them and further vet the idea
27. 387.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    certainly -- not necessarily the raw velocity of light, but the ability to augment other properties of light to increase the bandwidth. Is it correct then to say that augmenting the other properties of light increases overall information de
28. 388.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    I've been waiting for someone to do this...
29. 389.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    Hmm... NNs will be at light speed..? Are we still in the "glass era"?
30. 390.▲
    by 4b11b4 2y ago

    This really drives home the point eh?