464192002d7fe1c

9 ms·

31.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Completely agree. I've been forced to rescue a number of projects that have gone completely off the rails. Nearly invariably in my experience its because someone decided that their American workers were too expensive so they decided to
32.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
> whomever is responsible for brand communication at Google should be let go. I assume that's the crux of the problem. Whomever that is is either entirely impotent to impose a coherent vision across google or, probably more likely,
33.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
> welfare would be erased and a cash payout I'm basically fine with that concept behind that. I even think we can figure out how to pay for it. But, I think a lot of people aren't behind the first half of that statement. Since
34.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I'm not remotely sold on UBI (not sold against it either) but this article is just nonsense. It's very obviously intended to "preach to the choir" and not to discuss UBI in any serious terms or to convert anyone to the c
35.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
That russia hacked the DNC and Podesta's email, and gave their emails to wikileaks (something with assange explicitly denies), thus exposing how the DNC was rigging the primaries against Sanders (DNC hack) and how corrupt the clinton c
36.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I'm saying I don't believe that their conclusions aren't politically motivated. If someone can show evidence beyond "trust us, we swear russia did it!" then I will.
37.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
How is primary rigging fake news? Its very obvious from reading the wiki leaks emails that the DNC was brazenly biased towards Hillary and against Sanders.
38.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
al jazeera wears their biases on their sleeve, when I read something from them I know to read it with the understanding that its from the Qatar state-run media outlet. My primary issue with outlets like WaPo is that they pretend to be objec
39.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
ISIS, being famously known for not doing things against their best interest.
40.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Technically I also used my real name as my account name... just the md5 of my name :)
41.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Published? Link?
42.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Why do you think that individual smaller efforts are more likely to succeed than a single unified global effort. I see no evidence to support that. We're obviously going to spend a few years researching this before we start figuring ou
43.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
IRR would be cool, you can just ask for ASN.
44.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Suggestion: Please give me a longer text box I can paste a list of CIDRs into. I was copy/paste/click-add/rinse/repeat-ing for a while.
45.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Why wouldn't you sign up? It took me 30 seconds to sign up and another few minutes to copy/paste a list of my networks....
46.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
The fuel imbalance check-sheet also points out to make sure that the fuel imbalance isn't the result of a leak, and they did (somewhat -- it was dark outside) try to check for a leak. They could also have looked at the rate of fuel con
47.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Replying to myself to point out that basically every single air incident that people are bringing up in this thread is also covered on this show. Its well worth a watch.
48.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
Agreed, the earlier episodes were better, but I still don't think they were great. The last season of the show (when it was just Jayme/Adam) was actually fantastic though. I've never actually seen any of the biography series
49.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
How delightfully British.
50.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
RAT provides electrical generation too. Its all layers of protection, there are batteries for limited duration and limited equipment. RAT provides more (duration and functionality). There are some components that are considered like that GP
51.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
This is all historical revisionism. You need to look at the reasons that were given at the time, not the reasons people made up to justify and obfuscate what they did decades later.
52.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I suppose after watching this show, I now understand it better. But I now realize that pilot error is never just pilot error. Without some other failure or extraordinary circumstance, pilots have a damn hard time crashing a plane on their o
53.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
they should rename the flag button to #FakeNews
54.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
As much as I watch and enjoy Mythbusters, I rarely come out of watching that show feeling like I really learned something new or am particularly more knowledgable on a subject. Mythbusters is fun and entertaining, Mayday is educational and
55.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I think the very cool thing with this show is that it really illustrates how crashes are virtually never the byproduct of a single failure. The most fascinating ones to me are the ones where there is a completely survivable mechanical failu
56.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I'm not saying to completely dismiss it, but, keep a few things in mind. Firstly, there is no evidence from the CIA regarding the election hacks. There are anonymous sources who claim to work with/in the CIA and/or have infor
57.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
All of the actual evidence that I've seen so far is equivalent to an investigator seeing "made in china" written on a hammer used to smash a store window and saying "china broke into wal-mart". As far as Russia bene
58.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
First, I haven't seen anyone, CIA or not, provide any evidence to link russia with the DNC hacks (assuming that's what we mean by "russia hacked the election" this week) Second, "its complicated" is a terrible
59.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I believe they did.
60.
by 464192002d7fe1c 10y ago
I can highly recommend the Mayday (Air Crash Investigation/Air Emergency/Air Disasters/whatever its called this week) episode that deals with this, https://youtu.be/Bct1mWUp8to , and the show in general.

More ›