40four

85 ms·

901.
by 40four 9y ago
I agree it is interesting, but I think as a whole we should not reward sites like that with traffic from our community. I'd bet $20 someone affliated with the site posted this to drive traffic, & it briefly rose into the top 30 be
902.
by 40four 9y ago
This is my main gripe. It's not that the topic isn't interesting, I think it's very likely someone affliliated with the site linked to it. I'm a relative newcomer to HN, & I love the things I discover & learn her
903.
by 40four 9y ago
Now all of my comments expressing displeasure with this website are getting downvoted. I suspect whatever network of accounts colluded to upvote this trash briefly into the top 30(before it got flagged), are now downvoting anyone who says s
904.
by 40four 9y ago
Thank you. This website is a farce. It's disgusting this got any up votes.
905.
by 40four 9y ago
Agreed, this article is rubbish, and anyone who upvoted should be ashamed.
906.
by 40four 9y ago
Can we please not upvote articles from tabloid websites? The article is breif, shallow and has a glaring typo in it. This is not journalism. They simply reprinted some quotes. Zero research, zero value added to the conversation. Zero editi
907.
by 40four 9y ago
I see what you're saying about cleaning the data. This is something I'm very unfamiliar with, so good to know! Yeah I think the article is garbage too, makes me wonder why it gained so much traction? The argument/ topic are
908.
by 40four 9y ago
I don't get this article at all. The author does not really back up their argument with any examples of ML. What in the world does common marketing practice & seemingly basic SQL queries have to do with AI/ML? What am I missin
909.
by 40four 9y ago
As per the HN guidelines, on topic posts = "anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity". Maybe it doesn't qualify as news but the writing is fantastic & it certainly satisfied my intellect! I'm happy t
910.
Experimental evidence shows light can stop electrons(phys.org)
1 points by 40four 9y ago|0 comments
911.
by 40four 9y ago
Great tip about the intext: operator from @wahnfrieden. I'll admit I was unaware of this. Many of us could probably benefit from learning how to actually use Google more skillfully, instead of expecting the algorithm to spit out a &#x2