3np

49 ms·

661.
by 3np 2y ago
Not sure what you are even refering to. Could you be specific? Got examples in mind?
662.
by 3np 2y ago
You know what I've seen give decision-makers a false sense of security? "Zero Trust Architecture" and not thinking to deeply about the extent to which you're not actually removing overall trust from the system, just shif
663.
by 3np 2y ago
Even more confusable with especially the previous logo (but also current branding) of sendowl.com. https://www.courseplatformsreview.com/wp-content/uploads/202...
664.
by 3np 2y ago
Pokemon. Bonus: If you remember the numbers and do static assigment, now you have a scheme to map names to IP addresses in your head. An old Pokemon poster becomes an address lookup table. Any familiar theme with an ordering (periodic table
665.
by 3np 2y ago
FWIW, I think it was great (enough that it wouldn't hurt elaborating on the analogy when introducing it). My mind went to machinery turning rigid and clunky over time due to being caked-in with a crust of thickening dust/rust&#x2F
666.
by 3np 2y ago
Different workloads I guess but context-switching/CPU (and associated increase of memory bandwidth) is/was holding my N5xx/N6xxx back from properly utilizing I/O. But this was in the context of someone who has an N100 bu
667.
by 3np 2y ago
> > You present it as mutually exclusive. > I honestly have no idea what you mean. What is the "it" that I am presenting, and what do you think I presented it as excluding? Simplicity vs feature-rich. Your last follow-up
668.
by 3np 2y ago
In context though, you gave it as an example why people would not want more feature-rich software. The supposed simplicity of Python over Perl has nothing to do with Perl being more feature-rich and that compromising its simplicity. It seem
669.
by 3np 2y ago
While I haven't benchmarked, my reasoning is that for parallel workloads (especially VMs but also containers), penalty from context-switching should be vastly reduced by even those slower cores.
670.
by 3np 2y ago
I fail to see your point. To me, these three are all very close to each other in "simplicity" and any ordering seems arguable. If anything, isn't Perl simpler than Python and if not, why? Perhaps vast differences in ergonomic
671.
by 3np 2y ago
Supposedly it should be not too difficult to downclock the N100 such that you get same/similar performance as the J4125 for less heat/power?
672.
by 3np 2y ago
My experience mirrors yours. This is pretty closely related to the "visual programming" discussions we had on HN the other day. Another observation: If you do not have competent engineering representation in owning business units,
673.
by 3np 2y ago
Noticed the same thing and I hope we see the N305 from the same generation take over or more vendor offering both options. Considering the rest of the platform package, it can really benefit from 8 cores instead of just 4. The N100 can be a
674.
by 3np 2y ago
FP tends to have pro-US spin. This article reads as propaganda attempting to protect US interests.
675.
by 3np 2y ago
> Matrix is optimising for security/privacy at the cost of UX in other ways, and I get why. I wouldn't say so. Have you used Element Messenger? The default trust policy is certainly optimised for something else. Similarly to de
676.
by 3np 2y ago
> With a couple exceptions (like enums) Apart from a clueless engineer attempts them, it's been working out fine to pretend they don't exist.
677.
by 3np 2y ago
The ends justify the beans.
678.
by 3np 2y ago
Crazy true story: ANOM. Engineers thought they were building a totally above-water secure corporate internal messaging app and service. Actual users and customers were mostly organized crime. Unbeknownst to anyone byut the founder and their
679.
by 3np 2y ago
> crazy recursive dependent types Some edge-cases involving those have bugfixes and ergonomy improvents I've run into on 5.x.
680.
by 3np 2y ago
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/learner-english/... > to be covered with a thick, dry layer of something
681.
by 3np 2y ago
The phrase "may you live in interesting times" is the lowest in a trilogy of Chinese curses that continue "may you come to the attention of those in authority" and finish with "may the gods give you everything you a
682.
by 3np 2y ago
> Do you want to break your Linux installation or rearchitecure your runtime? [Y] (But really, Android dev is a qualitatively different level of fucked up compared to React or any major Python framework I can think of. React Native, thou
683.
by 3np 2y ago
> Not unlike in religion, a competing metaphysical framework (model of reality) to science. No. Correlation fallacy.
684.
by 3np 2y ago
In case it needs pointing out: Clickbait headline not backed by facts in article. > In other words, third-party security vendors must get the same access as Microsoft's own products. Which, on the face of it, is fair enough. Indeed,
685.
by 3np 2y ago
> The worst thing an eBPF program can do is to merely consume more resources than is desirable, such as CPU cycles and memory. This is obviously not true. It might be the worst it can do, by itself, to the currently running kernel. It&#x
686.
by 3np 2y ago
Why should distributing surplus funds fall on them, though? That's work, and it's not fun. Setting up a wider Jellyfin-ecosystem-donation-fund (or your favorite FLOSS project) is something anyone can do. Maybe someone reading this
687.
by 3np 2y ago
Anecdote from SWIM: Employer corp supposedly has CS deployed on all endpoints. Been getting away with just running it in a VM with restricted resources and not hearing anything about it. Did notice the VM failing around that time. Also hear
688.
by 3np 2y ago
I hope they start with the ones which are obviously fraudulent (most likely illegal) and have already been reported to them as such. For example "secure end-to-end-encrypted private chat apps" which actually send messages unencryp
689.
by 3np 2y ago
Questionable if I'd call this "work"...
690.
by 3np 2y ago
Not a fan of the namesquatting or appeal to authority or whatever you want to call the branding... Their GitHub profile ( https://github.com/git-ecosystem/ ), with a logo anyone could mistake for the official git logo:

More ›