38

42 ms·

481.
by 38 3y ago
> obscurantism damn thats a good word. I have known a lot of people like this, and they are really unpleasant to be around. I prefer the free flow of information and ideas.
482.
by 38 3y ago
this is Apple. this is not some random seller on Amazon.
483.
by 38 3y ago
> Visual Studio 1.82, the newest iteration of Microsoft’s popular open source code editor Visual Studio != Visual Studio code
484.
by 38 3y ago
or ascii85: -;cAU'UX5;VnaA:`a2[1
485.
by 38 3y ago
when people resort to doxing, it shows how truly pathetic they are. I pity those people.
486.
by 38 3y ago
when people resort to doxing, it shows how truly pathetic they are. I pity those people.
487.
by 38 3y ago
more lines of code, and still doesn't have flag parsing
488.
by 38 3y ago
yes it does
489.
by 38 3y ago
> Your code does not have more functionality than GNU's yes as written. it has flag parsing
490.
by 38 3y ago
It's a lose for C either way. Either it cant parse flags, or we remove that requirement, and my code goes from 9 lines to 6.
491.
by 38 3y ago
It's a lose for C either way. Either it cant parse flags, or we remove that requirement, and my code goes from 9 lines to 6.
492.
by 38 3y ago
I think anyone who has the ability to read and comprehend text would disagree with the comment I am replying to. Best of luck in the high school level reading class my friend.
493.
by 38 3y ago
> I'm genuinely curious to hear your argument. previous comments have demonstrated this not to be the case, so I will stand by my previous points. I have already made over 10 comments on this one topic, so if any aren't already
494.
by 38 3y ago
I think I have made it pretty clear already, but here it is again: the Go code has MORE functionality (flag parsing) with LESS code. yes its not as fast, and yes the executable is larger, but for many, thats a good tradeoff for the extra st
495.
by 38 3y ago
I am not seeing a technical argument here against the previous points, only one against the commenter: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
496.
by 38 3y ago
OK I am waiting...
497.
by 38 3y ago
It's a lose for C either way. Either it cant parse flags, or we remove that requirement, and my code goes from 9 lines to 6.
498.
by 38 3y ago
It's a lose for C either way. Either it cant parse flags, or we remove that requirement, and my code goes from 9 lines to 6.
499.
by 38 3y ago
I don't see proper flag parsing, I see an argv hack.
500.
by 38 3y ago
> go has proper flag parsing as part of the standard library and C doesn’t That's the whole point. Every single command line program needs command line parsing. Go helps me get the job done, C forces me to write my own parser, or fi
501.
by 38 3y ago
> C++ I just physically shuddered
502.
by 38 3y ago
doesnt work with Firefox: TypeError: e is undefined NextJS 11 [framework-63157d71ad419e09.js:9:69810](https://github-guessr.vercel.app/_next/static/chunks/framework-63157d71ad419e09.js)
503.
by 38 3y ago
mine is just normal idiomatic Go code. thats not true of the C code.
504.
by 38 3y ago
134 lines of C, with comments & whitespace
505.
by 38 3y ago
I don't see include, which means you're ignoring warnings aren't printing them in the first place. Also testing against a number instead of boolean. Also you have a horrible hack instead of proper flag parsing. And you'r
506.
by 38 3y ago
yes C lines of code: 112 yes Go lines of code: 9
507.
by 38 3y ago
um, who cares? most times people are needing to use "yes" as part of a "configure" script or similar. even if GNU yes was 10 times slower, it would NEVER be the bottleneck in any situation. so whats the point?
508.
by 38 3y ago
here is a Go implementation for fun: package main import "flag" func main() { yes := flag.String("m", "y", "message") flag.Parse() for { println(
509.
by 38 3y ago
Just learn Go. Honestly it's pretty simple to pick up, especially now with the slices package. I can't imagine using a loosely typed language anymore, even with an IDE to baby me.
510.
by 38 3y ago
Pretty harsh take. The windows issue is a deal breaker true, but zig is a great language. One of the few languages that I would consider state of the art, favoring innovation instead of being a C copycat.

More ›