Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
331c8c71
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
37 ms
·
451.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
What gives US the right to take Ukraine from Ukraine? Thats where the story started
452.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> Tatars captured a record number of 60,000 Ukrainians.[59] How it is relevant? Your claim was "Ukranians and Russians has been fighting for over 1000 years"
453.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> has been Russian vs. Ukrainian fighting for nearly a 1000 years (maybe more)? I'm still waiting for the source suggesting that ukranian and russians has been fighting for nearly 1000 years. That's what you wrote.
454.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
they effectively started a civil war by installing people who pretended that the eastern ukraine doesnt exist
455.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Could you be so kind to provide some references supporting your view?
456.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> Do you know about what Victoria Nuland (leaked intercepted tapes), Senator John McCain, Senator Lindsay Graham, Hunter Biden, CIA John Brennan, etc. did in Ukraine? They brought freedom and democracy to the Ukranian people. It is axiom
457.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
If anyone will be reading this. There is another passage in the US explanation which I didn't notice at the beginning. It has quite a different tone: > Today, however, the United States must once again express opposition to this res
458.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
That goes both ways. Partisan voting by "the west" is not much better than explicit trading in votes (imo).
459.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
And the rest of the world is just too dumb to notice that I guess...
460.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Thanks a lot. The position of the US is clear. And I was amused by the "explanations" of the Lithuania's foreign minister in the second link.
461.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
I am a bit dumbfounded. Is there a reasonable explanation for US and Ukraine explicitly voting against UN resolution titled "Combating glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary for
462.
▲
Only US and Ukraine voted against anti-nazi resolution at UN in 2020
(digitallibrary.un.org)
8 points
by
331c8c71
5y ago
|
12 comments
463.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> This is something you cannot ‘iterate on One can use views and modification triggers to split the public interface and a private implementation of a db. Whether it's feasible or worthwhile - it depends of course... It doesn'
464.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Overhead noise-cancelling headphones
465.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
undefined behavior
466.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
The non-carriers are not a control group unless we are 100% sure that the assignment is random. I find it hard to believe when the vast majority of population are carriers.
467.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Do you think a random production code snippet is approachable for someone lacking the necessary background? The notation in this paper is totally standard. EDIT: \mu there refers to a probability measure. Nothing to do with averages.
468.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> Yet they were constantly buried in discussion forums Well, I am like that. I find social media to be too addictive/distracting so I am off that shit completely. Older-school stuff is also addictive but to a lesser extent.
469.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Works unexpectedly well! As many others I am wondering how difficult/costly it'd be to have this assistant set up for another dataset.
470.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Looks perfect on mobile though (to me).
471.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
> it lowers the mental overhead by just having to perfect one of way of doing things. That's exactly the point. The mental burden of remembering the quirks of (and having to choose between) namedtuples, typeddicts, dataclasses etc i
472.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Long gone are the days of "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it" from PEP 20 ("Python Zen") and it's a pity IMO.
473.
▲
by
331c8c71
5y ago
Scala can be enjoyable but can be a major pain as well. Look no further than the de-facto standard build tool (sbt).