Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
317070
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
> I would respect you far more if you candidly admitted that you are violently envious of wealthier and happier families, and wish to manipulate the levers of the state to crush them and steal their property on your behalf. I don't
92.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
Of course? I think we are debating the same side of this point though: "Inheritance is a horrible way to divide prosperity within society, as it doesn't take into account the wants or needs of the people still alive." If that
93.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
Sure, almost all parents want the best for their children. But not every child has a parent that can or wants to provide the best for them. You are framing the issue as a right you have for society to provide for your children when you are
94.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
I'm sorry, I genuinly don't understand your point. Could you expand a bit?
95.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
Eddington is a fictional community, with 2 people: Ed and Sue. Unfortunately, due to lack of housing, they only have 1 house. The decision is made to hand it to Sue, because Ed's _parents_ were alcoholics that drank their life away. Th
96.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
That sounds like a lottery for housing, with extra steps? Hypothetical scenario: we have 100 houses, and 200 young families looking for one. Your solution in effect is: let's give 100 houses to the 100 young people with an inheritance.
97.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
A common proposal I'm fond of, is that you get a budget (of say 1 million) you are allowed to inherit tax free across the span of your life. This incentivises the rich to split up their fortune, and allows the poor to keep control of o
98.
▲
by
317070
11mo ago
First, the author is actually wrong. The date is not 5 years before you submit, but is 5 years before the form is received by the home office! So there are a few days of uncertainty, depending on how fast Royal Mail was with the physical do
99.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
Do you have some primary sources for the statement that he is a jihadi? Do you have any primary source for the statement that he cheered ethnic cleansing? I've been looking, but all I find is that: > Mr Hamdi has previously denied a
100.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
But imagine the value of finding _any_ living RNA based life which is clearly not from earth before we travel to other stars. It's one thing to know there was once life, and to know basically nothing about it. But being able to date it
101.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
There was the Byte Latent Transformer, to end the tokenizer, which seemingly went nowhere. https://ai.meta.com/research/publications/byte-latent-transf...
102.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
> BigCorp will always pick machine over you if they can. But, people might not always prefer BigCorp over humans, if they can?
103.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
The paper: `Rapid amyloid-β clearance and cognitive recovery through multivalent modulation of blood–brain barrier transport` https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-025-02426-1 "Cognitive assessments revealed that
104.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
It is technically correct that Sam Altman and everyone on OpenAI's board are individual people, but I don't see how that would prevent legal action?
105.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
The author lives in the US.
106.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
https://searcha.page/s?q=blog https://seek.ninja/s?q=blog Both of them are erroring out right now?
107.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
The apparent size of the moon is 0.5 degrees. So 0.3 degrees is not _that_ narrow. You can point your finger at the moon.
108.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
Voyager is so far away that from its perspective, earth isn't moving. There is also no force acting on voyager. So practically speaking, compared to the distance between them and the 0.3° beam width, both are hanging pretty still. It d
109.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
The antenna has a beam width of 0.3°. So it only needs to aim that accurately in the general direction of earth. In general, antennas don't need to aim more or less accurately as they get closer or further away, it is only in function
110.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
It's funny how people are so surprised? This story was already fictionalized in 2004's "Team America - World Police". SEALs, North Korea, it's all there. Special Forces are secretive, and almost as a law of nature t
111.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
Love it. The winning design is using handcrafted weights already.
112.
▲
The Asshole Filter
(mrsteinberg.com)
3 points
by
317070
1y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
I was there when it was chosen all those years ago. At the time (2007-2009), Matlab was the application of choice for what would become "deep" learning research. Though it had its warts, and licensing issues. It was easy for stude
114.
▲
Artificial Intelligence Helps Boost LIGO
(caltech.edu)
2 points
by
317070
1y ago
|
0 comments
115.
▲
Using AI to perceive the universe in greater depth
(deepmind.google)
1 points
by
317070
1y ago
|
0 comments
116.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
It is. But! Wasserstein distances are used instead of a KL inside all kinds of VAE's and diffusion models, because while the Wasserstein distance is hard to compute, it is easy to make distributions whose expectation is the gradient wr
117.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
So, one of my favourites is this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Man_Without_Words Not a good book by any means, but there has been surprisingly little written about people who go from having no language to their
118.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
It doesn't help that the main conclusion of over 100 years of this kind of animal language research, is that -- and I quote -- "animals don't have language" [0] [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gr
119.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
> It's just that economies are systems with feedback loops that exist on islands of stability. Like a ball on top of a hill. OK, I get that that is indeed what makes these headlines tick, but if we take a step back. That is a ridicu
120.
▲
by
317070
1y ago
I had never realised that. Is there an eponymous law about this? (Or some other kind of reference?) Should I call it Parson's law?
More ›