Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
2h
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
31 ms
·
301.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
huh damn https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupy_Wall_Street#Origins
302.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
Why did you reply to yourself?
303.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> Drew went back in time to add -reuse to Go 1.19 and proxy improvements to the Go team's schedule where did anyone say that?
304.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
did you read the update to the article, as it answers that question
305.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
did you read the update in the article? The Go team contact him directly and in private, as well as accepted responsibility for the situation regarding all small sites, not just SourceHut. So his actions did have an impact.
306.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
thats a cop out. If he accepted the quick fix, then Go team could just say "well it works for him, so now we dont need to do the full fix", or maybe they decide to slow play it. It was nearly two years, enough is enough.
307.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> There is a $25 fee if the learner elects to sign up and begin coursework, and an optional $400 fee to receive college credit for each course. Learners who register before March 7, 2023 will receive special scholarship pricing of $350 p
308.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
FYI dont need to escape, you can use IRI: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Béton_brut
309.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> WF in the store AKA shopping. this service is useful, but as others have said it was never sustainable. would you do someones shopping for $10?
310.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
uBlock Origin blocks that site for some reason
311.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
I never tipped before, so no problem there
312.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
no windows: https://github.com/fubark/cyber/issues/1
313.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
not open source
314.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
Yes even $500 would be quite helpful for people down on their luck. It's not enough for rent, but just about everything else. You could get an old car, or clothes, shower, any number of vital goods to help you get back on your feet.
315.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
IF I think to insult them, I will make sure to take your comment into consideration. but since I HAVE NOT and do not intend to insult them, then it seems your point is moot.
316.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
bad netiquette is rude. Forcing people to internet search a comment just to understand it is quite rude. https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Etiquette_in_technology
317.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> And is the necessary escalation when online-only tools have failed and the attacker will not relent other tools are available (captcha, TLS fingerprinting, browser fingerprinting). if the moderator is not using these, its not a free pe
318.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
working for me, even with JS disabled. I do have hwcdn.net whitelisted though
319.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
so they have resulted to crime, to combat a problem user?
320.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
this is a user posting on an issue tracker, so your example doesn't hold either.
321.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> A captcha doesn't keep out harassing users; they're human, after all. its not my job to teach people how to police their own forums. nor is it the judicial systems job.
322.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> If your position is "Well they should involve the courts first," no because no crime has been committed, unless you count the doxxing.
323.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> tying the behavior to the person behind the behavior and bringing proper consequences to bear is the only regulatory system that actually works nope. trolling online is not a crime, so no regulations are needed. its the same as if some
324.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
trolling online is not a crime, so no crime, so no right to face anyone.
325.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> GBP Google Business Profile. its common courtesy to use the full name with the first use, THEN abbreviate.
326.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> nobody has a natural right to anonymity is this a joke? https://epic.org/issues/democracy-free-speech/anonymity
327.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
this is just more rationalizing. to justify doxxing, which is itself essentially stalking (or worse) should be a quite high bar, which hasn't been crossed, even in this situation. If the troll was threatening life or some other crime,
328.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
no, this is not acceptable. If you have an issue with someone online, ban their email, ban their IP and move on. It is not appropriate to go hunting this person in real life. you yourself have then become the creep, the person acting inappr
329.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
Only millions of businesses every single day
330.
▲
by
2h
4y ago
> See, unlike many people I don’t regard FFmpeg as something unique (in the sense that it’s a project only Fabrice Bellard could create). It was nice to have around and it helped immeasurably but without it something else would fill the
More ›