23B1

10 ms·

61.
by 23B1 2y ago
What about the app don't you like? I ask because I'm done with Spotify and looking for the next service.
62.
by 23B1 2y ago
Dang that sucks. Man, I really, really hate this situation.
63.
by 23B1 2y ago
On this topic, I'm sick and tired of Spotify's recommendation algorithm and ready to jump to a superior service, would love to hear HN's recommendations. Happy to pay for a good service. My listening style basically comes dow
64.
by 23B1 2y ago
There's no mystery to infra being both vulnerable and accessible, especially to belligerent world powers. It's all just degrees of consequence for attacking those components. Additionally, a journalist would probably (reasonably)
65.
by 23B1 2y ago
You could be right!
66.
by 23B1 2y ago
oh no
67.
by 23B1 2y ago
The former are interesting topics to be sure, but have very little to do with with active engagement in modern society.
68.
by 23B1 2y ago
> The fact that the topics are hard to understand does not mean you can skip understanding and go straight to arguing about it. Depends on the topic. If its about, say, policy, then yes, you absolutely can and should. Certainly being inf
69.
by 23B1 2y ago
QED
70.
by 23B1 2y ago
Your answer is in fact the lazy one. The topics that are often beset with controversy and conspiracy are heavily technical. "You should do your own research" is fine when we're talking about the fall of Rome or aliens in spac
71.
by 23B1 2y ago
yes
72.
by 23B1 2y ago
My biggest challenge making adult friends is that most of them are still children.
73.
by 23B1 2y ago
Yes, and "active therapeutic/somatic/mystical work on your attachment wounds" is doing wonders for polyamory lmao
74.
by 23B1 2y ago
Because decadence and social degeneracy – especially inside tech – deserves to be mocked ruthlessly.
75.
by 23B1 2y ago
No, my position is that your opinion(s) are so disconnected to reality that, much like the article, can be safely ignored as bullshyt.
76.
by 23B1 2y ago
Both terms are subjective and therefore don’t support your argument.
77.
by 23B1 2y ago
This works when you are dealing with an organization that is run by sensible and wise people who are focused on building a better organization by building better people This does not work in places where you are a number, or a cog, or readi
78.
by 23B1 2y ago
A lot of people will say "word of mouth" without defining it. The key is to have regular but not annoying conversations with prospects. Don't put them on a mailing list (unless you're somehow uniquely interesting and c
79.
by 23B1 2y ago
> This is just an ad for their photo service. Good. The more companies that treat users like humans instead of chattel the better.
80.
by 23B1 2y ago
> and he actively empathised with the protestors. https://www.simplypsychology.org/narcissistic-mirroring.html
81.
by 23B1 2y ago
Neither they nor Elon can or should be trusted to tell the truth. The only utility this statement should have is to illustrate whatever public narrative OAI wishes to affect.
82.
by 23B1 2y ago
People say "hardware is hard" but that's because it's true. Congratulations man, really cool work.
83.
by 23B1 2y ago
I remember posting Strandbeest to https://www.webdesignmuseum.org/gallery/kaliber10000-2003 way back in the early 2000s or so! Warms my heart that he's still going.
84.
by 23B1 2y ago
Not to mention streaming/digital media is going to kill off actually good movies and content. This isn't the technology's fault mind you, but the streamers' business model, but you could rely upon residuals via DVD sales
85.
by 23B1 2y ago
These are all banal platitudes built on the same basic rage that you purport to dislike; the solution you imply requires centralization and censors. The only solution is also the easiest; switch it off.
86.
by 23B1 2y ago
Yes, full redundancy in one's entire supply chain, corporate structure, business services, infra, and finances is both efficient and feasible. 9_9
87.
by 23B1 2y ago
> it’s very unwise to build a business whose success is based entirely on the whims of another business. Show me a business free of dependencies and I'll eat my hat.
88.
by 23B1 2y ago
It is vitally important that scientists put their duty above their burning desire to have a 'hot take', especially in medicine and public health. This shouldn't be controversial.
89.
by 23B1 2y ago
Having reliable sources for scientific news and a high standard for truth therein is obviously important, moral, and good. Your opinion is wrong.
90.
by 23B1 2y ago
It can be boiled down to incentive alignment - though a lot of people (falsely) believe that incentives can (or should) be tuned for social good. > is there evidence of motives leading to actual misbehavior? Yes. Having a 'very stro

More ›