22c

45 ms·

511.
by 22c 5y ago
> 6-8 plants are needed per person to endure if there is no air circulation (significance you can stay in a completely air covered area if you had these plants). I'm trying to decipher what this means, but just in case someone think
512.
by 22c 5y ago
> the framework concludes that calculus is overvalued, even for gifted students. I was never taught calculus when I was in high school, when my mind was perhaps a bit more pliable, and I really wish I was. I've mostly gotten by alri
513.
by 22c 5y ago
>overwhelmed hospitals Something that has never been properly explained to me is how "overwhelmed" the hospitals were in relation to their normally "overwhelmed" state. I wrote a script which extracted time series dat
514.
by 22c 5y ago
That's simple, you just stake more coins. Staking rewards go back into the stake, so it is compounding (ie. you stake 100, get a reward of 1, you are now staking 101). As long as you don't unstake, your stake will grow over time.
515.
by 22c 5y ago
>Backblaze and S3 cannot conjure storage space out of thin air. The same goes for Proof-of-Storage miners, right? Whoever has the most buying power wins.
516.
by 22c 5y ago
> more RPis (or other compute resources) wouldn't let you mine more/faster. Essentially, because there is no computationally intensive work being done. Proof-of-Stake is kind of like saying: "I have 100 of these coins stak
517.
by 22c 5y ago
Proof-of-Stake != Proof-of-Space Also Proof-of-Space != Proof-of-Storage (seems a lot of people are conflating the two in this thread as well).
518.
by 22c 5y ago
DroidScript users already sound like a fringe market. Seems like the perfect candidate for F-Droid, however I don't know what the F-Droid policy is on showing ads (which sounds like they are not too concerned about keeping in the app,
519.
by 22c 5y ago
>How would eliminating all Proof-of-Work cryptocurrencies and shifting entirely to Proof-of-Stake eliminate the incentive for miners to monopolize every last bit of computing resources they can? I guess the point here is that you could e
520.
by 22c 5y ago
If you're genuinely asking this question, it really depends on what you mean by "tied to PoW systems". Currently the three largest PoS networks that I know of are Polkadot/Kusama, Harmony and Fantom. They are functional
521.
by 22c 5y ago
It's possible that we'll see attempts to regulate these markets in a similar way to how binary options trading has become regulated in some markets.
522.
by 22c 5y ago
Rhetorical tool? No it's a logical fallacy because you are misrepresenting the argument made by the OP in an attempt to attack it and you're confusing the deaths of family members with a little bit of lost revenue. Here's a b
523.
by 22c 5y ago
>I think I have been pretty open with my own perspective in TFA. Perspective and bias are two different things. >I addressed both of these in TFA, too. No you didn't, or I wouldn't have asked. You mention proof-of-stake in p
524.
by 22c 5y ago
You're asking people to document their own bias, so I think it is only fair to point out yours. Do you believe that cryptocurrency as a whole is an abject disaster? Do you support efforts to reform consensus with alternatives to Proof-
525.
by 22c 5y ago
Are you playing logical fallacy bingo? You managed to turn OPs argument into a strawman, while also making an appeal to emotion and poisoning the well.
526.
by 22c 5y ago
Do you think that is related to cryptocurrency, or simply any fast moving asset in general? How many people really bought GME just to stick it to the hedge funds? How many people really liked the stock?
527.
by 22c 5y ago
So it seems Drew is biased here, he is biased because his service is being used by thieves to make money. My tainted opinion: I think the criticisms of Proof-of-Work are totally justified here. There are perverse incentives for "miners
528.
by 22c 6y ago
I have noticed in my own life, particularly in the last 3-4 months, more instances of tinnitus. I suspect in my case it is as you say; working from home with headphones on all day for ~12 months has started to catch up to me.
529.
by 22c 6y ago
I would say it is less likely that VPS providers are intentionally giving out blacklisted IPs and more likely that VPS customers are getting their providers IPs blacklisted. Perhaps VPS providers should consider putting some of their custom
530.
by 22c 6y ago
These do already exist and there are many of them already on both Ethereum and Binance Smart Contract networks. More will be coming with SORA/Polkadot and I suspect it won't be long before they are on Harmony, as well (basically a
531.
by 22c 6y ago
Appreciate the project, web archives are becoming an important part of the internet ecosystem. I personally have no issue with the defaults, but if you've agonized over the defaults, perhaps you should consider clearly documenting it i
532.
by 22c 6y ago
I think it depends on what techniques are applied. There seems to be specialist branches of CBT such as MCBH and ACT which might be better suited to these scenarios. However, my point is that the article seems to spend more time telling us
533.
by 22c 6y ago
It's not 1% slippage on a 10m trade though, that was on a 1000 FIL trade. Crypto support is quite fickle. I didn't even go near the withdrawal aspect, but withdrawing anything more than ~5 BTC worth of currency from an exchange wi
534.
by 22c 6y ago
I wish there were a little more examples of how this methodology deals with the stress/anxiety response. The article seems to spend more time talking about why it thinks "thinking brain" CBT/talk therapy doesn't wor
535.
by 22c 6y ago
>and it takes fifteen seconds to sell $10,000,000 worth of FIL for USD. That's an oversimplification. If you dumped ~ $10m of FIL in such a short time, you'd undoubtedly drive the price down while doing so. Right now, Kraken sh
536.
by 22c 6y ago
With the help of a team of tugboats and a high tide. https://youtu.be/Msob1cxFWJw
537.
by 22c 6y ago
I still think you might be throwing the baby out with the bathwater; though I admit there's a lot more bathwater than baby, especially when compared with first glance.
538.
by 22c 6y ago
Do you also trust that the recipient will keep their emails secure? Edit: Moreover, if we assume that there could be a bad actor that wants to know your secret, you have now endangered that 3rd party by giving them your secret. Again, anoth
539.
by 22c 6y ago
Yes but according to the protocol you MUST use Arweave to do so. The blockchain can already store data for you, not large chunks of data, but BTC can store 1MB which should be more than enough to put a link to Arwave, S3, ipfs, coordinates
540.
by 22c 6y ago
Yes, honestly, you should assume that the recipient is also an archaeologist. If you do not trust the recipient to act with your best interests at heart, do not use this service. I think that should probably be explained better in the docum

More ›