20k

8 ms·

121.
by 20k 3mo ago
Out of interest, what (vaguely) is the amount of time you need between maintenance refreshes?
122.
by 20k 3mo ago
Dependencies: stolen from all code ever written without permission, including extremely illegal content But other than that, totally dependency free!
123.
by 20k 3mo ago
Analysing codebases with LLMs to find security vulnerabilities is completely unrelated to committing code generated with LLMs
124.
by 20k 4mo ago
Sure but then it'd just be hosted somewhere else
125.
by 20k 4mo ago
>Say what you want about EA, but they not only tolerated Open RA They also don't have a choice though. There's nothing illegal or actionable about OpenRA. At most EA could have potentially forced them not to refer to CnC on the
126.
by 20k 4mo ago
LLMs can't be sued or commit crimes as they aren't legal people In this case its likely google that would be responsible for putting up the fake information. There's been some court cases around this already
127.
by 20k 4mo ago
it sure sucks when people steal your hard work for free without paying for it doesn't it anthropic
128.
by 20k 4mo ago
AI is a terrible teacher though. It makes stuff up all the time, and for some subjects it has a remarkably low accuracy rate
129.
by 20k 4mo ago
The incredible laggyness of that website does not inspire confidence. Much of the text selection is also broken, and chrome consumes nearly a full core trying to render.. something? Its remarkable that anyone thought this website was fit fo
130.
by 20k 4mo ago
>if 60% of the pixels within a region on a higher dpi display would be lit, then that is best approximated* by a single pixel emitting the same number of photons as those pixels would (which is 60% as many photons as there should be in t
131.
by 20k 4mo ago
>When antialiasing, I think you do want to model light: a fully black object occluding 40% of a pixel should cause it to emit 40% less light. Linear intensity representations of colour should therefore be used. The antialiasing value you
132.
by 20k 4mo ago
This article contains some pretty major errors, which is kind of surprising to see! >The transformation used to represent the physically linear intensity data either generated synthetically via an algorithm or captured by a linear device
133.
by 20k 4mo ago
I've been programming in OpenCL for 10+ years. This article is clearly AI generated, and its also completely wrong OpenCL did not fragment into a mess of vendor specific extensions. I don't know where that even comes from, the e
134.
by 20k 4mo ago
A kid with $4k to burn on a credit card though? A lot of things would have had to go wrong for this to be a child
135.
by 20k 4mo ago
AMD's entire software development strategy is insane. OpenCL was doing reasonably well, and then AMD have just fully dropped support for some reason. For the - albeit not huge - but actual cross platform API that people were using to d
136.
by 20k 4mo ago
Distributed a compressed copy of something is still copyright infringement
137.
by 20k 4mo ago
Honestly? Yes. This is why its such a problem that most of the training data was not used with permission, and without the correct copyright status or license associated with it There's a lot of arguments about humans doing the same th
138.
by 20k 4mo ago
Yes, and realistically any code that LLMs produce is a derivative work of its training data. There's going to be a huge disaster licensing wise I have absolutely no idea how LLMs got through anyone's legal departments, I guess the
139.
by 20k 4mo ago
Apparently I'm just a moron and have never seen it has settings in 10+ years. Thanks!
140.
by 20k 4mo ago
Yes, and LLMs have been shown to store and be able to output their training data, so this is at best very sketchy
141.
by 20k 4mo ago
Git is part of the LLM's training set though, so simply asking it to recreate git in another language is pretty equivalent. Like, you can almost certainly get these LLMs to output gits full source code with some prompting, so there&#x2
142.
by 20k 4mo ago
Thanks for this, I'll go have a look
143.
by 20k 4mo ago
Its not the tabs themselves crashing, its when firefox (or my pc as a whole - I'm a developer and its a frequent occurance) crashes, firefox isn't as good as chrome at remembering what tabs were previously open
144.
by 20k 4mo ago
Weird, it still only highlights a single occurrence for me if I ctrl-f something, is there a setting for this or something?
145.
by 20k 4mo ago
For me the two reasons I can't live without are 1. Firefox's ctrl-f search doesn't highlight all instances of a found item on the right hand side. It sounds petty, but its a gigantic timesaver for looking through research doc
146.
by 20k 4mo ago
In some of the experiments, the same random noise background exists with different black blobs superimposed at where you expect the correct value to be. Ie they took a fixed realistic-ish looking background, and drew in the 'correct&#x
147.
by 20k 4mo ago
Sure, but I'd like it to be good
148.
by 20k 4mo ago
There is absolutely no data, review, evidence, or any indication whatsoever of how this is being used, or what the efficacy of it is The current trend of every industry is to jump onto anything, call it AI, and pretend its being used everyw
149.
by 20k 4mo ago
Usage isn't really a good indicator of quality currently in the AI space, the issue is that there's inherently no way that an AI physics sim can be as good as a real physics simulation, which makes it a very low value prospect
150.
by 20k 4mo ago
I've consistently tried to apply LLMs to physics problems and they're utterly useless. They'll just confidently lie, or blatantly plagiarise source materials The issue is once you hit niche physics simulations there simply is

More ›