1oooqooq

35 ms·

871.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
right. it's a forum for start ups and small entrepreneurs, but everyone comment like they are already bigger than meta and as above the law as musk.
872.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
sounds great for china. pretend invasion, suffer no consequence because never actually invaded, but still destroy the enemy silicon fab advantages.
873.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
these thing will come, after it's too late. robber Barons also destroyed nature and communities. only in their old age they tried to be remembered by universities and libraries. only question is if musk and Zuckerberg will build their
874.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
that's exactly what the connect implied. as with apple having done that at least twice in the open.
875.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
facepalm emoji
876.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
rust feels like java. casting from useless type ad nauseam. heavy reliance on IDE for all the ergonomic annoyances. cargo downloading the world. honestly, truly modern C might be what you're looking for.
877.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
they do mention the dns are still owned by advertising agencies fronts...
878.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
yes. all the world, except white Americans. who are the only group still bewitched by blue SMS icons and facetime. Whatsapp is what allow Zuckerberg to be so bold with the other zombie properties.
879.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
why is it so difficult to provide a mere link?
880.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
yeah, i wouldn't start spreading this "news" until i see it on !dailymail
881.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
i imagine the thought process went "oh, indentation is much inferior to braces. i know, let me use the second worst option to braces."
882.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
so, it was 99% based on dns hijack, but he says nothing about how it was done?
883.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
but not paying attention to the ramifications is troublesome. for example, web3 was exclusively a scam, but it shifted power and economies because it was entrenched in high places (mostly oligarchs evading sanctions and with that, politicia
884.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
sequoia and yc! interesting. seems very predatory too. $3/mo in places where cost of living is as low as $100/mo. plus $30+ fees for every little thing, even a charge back! money is simply stored, no interest of any kind. claim ev
885.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
why are you surprised? Linux foundation is today's w3c for server software. they exist exclusively to push corporate will on open source and specifications. why people assume it is related to Linux or the kernel baffles me. but that&#x
886.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
because npm+electron is the vb3 of today
887.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
yeah my point is that most dns servers used outside the major markets do not support any of this double key stuff. if you want TLD not available at your us registrar, you're stuck with low dkim keys. period. doesn't matter what sp
888.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
they are problably hosting the bots
889.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
is there a place with a list of aws servers these companies can block?
890.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
specs supports many things. I believe the question was more about the real world.
891.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
remember when yahoo mail was the first one to implement DKIM validation and then all mailing list owners added a footer telling their subscribers not to use yahoo mail because it was broken, instead of calling their mailing list providers t
892.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
dns server limitations. txt records are 1024bits... add the prefix for the key and you get <1024. to use a larger key you must combine many txt records in a never ending comical interoperability issues. the first one usually being that y
893.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
because everyone recommending those things work on both sides. they recommend 2048 and use 4096 themselves because if they need to ever break your 2048 it's less bad than if you were recommended to use 4069. wink wink same with everyon
894.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
we are definitely not. most countries registrar's won't support DNS hacks requied for larger dkim. we still use the minimum key size in most countries.
895.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
template<typename T> struct __df_st : T { [[gnu::always_inline]] inline __df_st(T g) : T(g) { // empty } [[gnu::always_inline]] inline ~__df_st() { T::operator()(); } }; #define __DEFER__(V) __df_st
896.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
is that web3 speak for "we wouldn't want you stealing from the people we are stealing"
897.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
misdemeanor. up to 1k fine. if even exists in your state. so toothless also.
898.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
they have a very "interesting" definition of private data on the paper. it's so outlandish that if you buy their definition, there's zero value on the trained data. heh. they also claim unsuppervisioned users typing away
899.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
basically "passkey is a good session cache when you already have a password or a magic link" an entitled dev from apple who shops at Albertsons just like passkey with password-reset-as-login-flow. nothing to see here.
900.
by 1oooqooq 2y ago
that's the plan. passkey solve the company problem, not the user's. it's like FB using your phone number as your immutable id.

More ›